◆ SpookStack

dee Were tenant 1 TE IA MAYING THE TRECPOIAnN CPVUING fT wriecutTr AN a 4 trike Vion vs 1) Wee iv PAGE THREE - TWELVE, FORTY SIX. HE FELT THAT BOTH THESE CHANGES RESULTED IN A CONSERVATION OF MATERIALS AND THUS WAS NOT IN VIOLATION OF ANY CPA ORDER. HE RULED THAT THE PLOT PLAN DATED MARCH TWENT WAS THE QUOTE DEFINITIVE DOCUMENT AS TO SIZE, AND CONSTRUCTION WAS IN CLOSE CONFORMITY TO THIS PLAN UNQUOTE. HE STATED THAT WILE THERE WAS TESTIMONY BYQRRMMMMIB AND OTHER WITNESSES FOR THE RESPONDENTS AT THE FIRST HEARING THAT THE PLAN OF JANUARY =a reaswrews TWELVE WAS THE BAS?C PLAN, HE FELT THERE WAS NO MATERIAL Se ———— DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO PLANS WHICH WOULD INFLUENCE HIS DECISION, THE FIRST DIFFERENCE BEING THAT THE MARCH TWENTY TWO = /.7C PLANS WHICH WERE INTRODUCED BY THE GOVERNMENT ARE SMALLER AS TO SIZE. HE FELT THAT THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF M!SREPRESENTATI ON NOR HAVING BEEN URGED BY THE GOVERNMENT. QQMMMBDID not TESTIFY AND HE THOUG STATING TOMMBMBBMBTHAT THEY WERE BUILDING ONE BUILDING WAS MERELY{ CONCLUSION. MAL SO FELT THAT RESPONDENTS! TESTIMONY AT FIRST HEARING THAT TUNNELS CONTINUED UNDER ENTIRE QUOTE HORSESHOE UNQUOTE WAS ONLY THE CONCLUSION OF THE WITNESSES AND THE IDEAS THAT THEY HAD GAINED FROM HAVING TALKED TO THE ARCHITECTS. HE FELT THEY WERE MATERIALLY MISSTATING THE FACTS. HE STATED HE QUOTE TOSSED THE TUNNELS OUT IN CONNECTIO = WITH OTHER EVIDENCE SHOWING A CONNECTION BETWEEN