◆ SpookStack

< f . . ia - a 4 2 7 _ 5 os * _ ° - y. 7 - a pete Ali , aor ~ a ty ete . oe _ _ 7 ran Tighter British Security a _ ae _ Tests Said to Match Th oe 2 . oo. | - ; a - Washington Finds in London's New Code pe SO . bE. Vindication of Standards Long Used IT . oo ~~ f ' for US. Government Employes .--} : a Soo soe -. - |. Special to The New York Times, <2. yw tgi ee Te teres _ Looe re WASHINGTON, March 31— vant be removed from secret po so en ; Britain has come a long way to-| work if married to a Communist Oe less matching the United States|°* Communist sympathizer, wre, a ow - - . in the severity of {ts security ar- . rangéements for Government am- ployes, . . . : Afministration, reals have - - ' fread with great interes i oo. Co ee White Paper presented to Parliae tional practices: Mbe hice co ae . a nen ee ster she? Pes thans Paper found that decisions might ‘4 . have to be taken in some secur. : ‘Eden. They find in the new ity cases without revealing full jBritish security code a clear detally of supporting evidence in vindica ion of standards long order to, safeguard offi applic4 Jere, ; sou f information. In sddi- Thy tightening of British secu-|srurces of Inf rity arrangements was agreed to/U the te Paper conceded whith a job would be herrot Tretommnendation af ¢hea Moe, - recommenda navie UE LE wOnleér- vy Councilors, goaded te a man because of ence of Pri by bitter criticism over the flight to the Sevier U of Donald MacLeanfing Gu ish diplomats, New British Standards .~_ Among the new British stand- ards paralleling those long ap- tied here United States officials cited today the pugwing: DEFECTS OF CHARACTER AND CONDUCT. Britain has| Washington officials who havel | - fiseardad the nets nto eiscarcea Ghe priicipie that a spent years grappling with the jeivil servant's character ts his|security problem said today that/. jown business. The White Paper|the British Government had ev- jSignal, the change in these idently come to conclusions sim- words: “Today great importancelilar to theirs about the means afi: must be paid to difaracter dee dealing with potential subversion]. though nothing may have been | ‘The Privy Councilors held that’ senia] to the state, however dis-; tasteful they might be to the: English public. . ‘ by the Eden Government on the|14t there might be cases in! a these counter-measures were oa , doubt about his reliability, “aj! <0" } fects as factors tending to makelor disloyalty by government em- H 5 a Inan unreliable or expose him loves. |. -- 7} ore i to blackmail, or influence by for-| ‘The new British security sys-) "* -: 3 = eign agents, There is a duty onitem differs : £ - = ; epartments to inform them- . 4 x... Uae qedgemencies - ives of serious failings such as focpqwpercce ree e ee coee TIMES : “= runkenhess, addiction toe drugs,istandards for the most Fensitive/: fgets . N Y. Be, homosexuality or any loose liv-|sectors of government—the Fan POM me 25D 4 1956 a =. mg that may seriously affect aleign Office, the defense services|. . le. Be arn + wal. man's reliability.” . and the atomic energy establish- ee ete Meet. BM OF fF ASSOCIATIONS.” The Privy|ment—than for other depart-}° pot owe tT oe . . _ . so uncflors upheld the practice/ments. - : ag ac iWeb te f “tilting the balance in favor) It also regards outright ddis-| - a . oA wo eo offering greater Protection to;missal from the public service as' “" ; we 7 ~ rr e security. of the state rather} last resort, suggesting that in ‘ a wo, y ' yO tes " an in the direction of saf many cases it may be enough to Poet ; ye 2 eC th ok oe ing the rights of the indiJtransfer a Suspected individual Ree ae cet dj They went so far adito less sensitive work or to hold ~ | | |