Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Criminal Profiling — Part 4
Page 25
25 / 25
Ressler et al. / MURDERERS WHO RAPE AND MUTILATE
raised by MacCulloch and colleagues about acting out sadistic fan-
tasies, this article discusses results of an assessment of the relation-
ship between sexual abuse in childhood or adolescence and sexual
interests, activities, and deviations in convicted sexually oriented
killers.
METHOD
Apprehension of a crime suspect is the job of law enforcement.
In many crimes, this task is fairly straightforward when a motive
(e.g., robbery, revenge) has been identified. However, in many crimes
the motive is not readily apparent. FBI agents became involved in
assisting local law enforcement agencies in their profiling of un-
solved homicide cases in the early 1970s. ‘These crimes, often referred
to as ‘‘motiveless,” were analyzed by the agents to include a sexual
component. The agents, sensitive to crime scene information, began
their own efforts at classifying characteristics of the murderer by
virtue of evidence found at the crime scene. From this evidence they
devised a new typology that characterized crime scene patterns as
being organized or disorganized. This typology inferred a motiva-
tional framework that included expectations, planning, and justi-
fication for the criminal action as well as “hunches” regarding
postcrime behaviors. As a result, particular emphasis was placed on
the thinking patterns dominating the murderer's actions indicating
differences in acts committed against the victim and suggesting sub-
categories of motivational constructs.
The selection of subjects and methodology used to develop the
organized/disorganized typology are reported elsewhere (Ressler
etal., 1985). Briefly, FBI special agents collected data in various U.S.
prisons between 1979 and 1983. The data set for each murderer con-
sisted of the best available data from two types of sources: official
records and interviews with the offenders.
To qualify for the study, a murder had to be classified through
crime scene observations and evidence as a sexual homicide. These
observations included the following: victim attire or lack of attire;
exposure of sexual parts of the victim’s body; sexual positioning of
victim’s body; insertion of foreign objects into victim's body cavities;
or evidence of sexual intercourse. Primary analysis was conducted on
information about the crime scenes of 36 sexually oriented murderers.
84
›
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic