Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
FBI Miami Shooting 4 11 86 — Part 1
Page 18
18 / 78
incidents, were carried out by common subjects (exact number
unknown). The frequency of the robbéries, as well as the
relatively confined area of the activity, led to a hypothesis
that these subjects would carry out similar-style robberies in
the near future and stage these heists in the same neighborhood.
Prior to April 11, 1986, the Miami Office increased liaison with
armored couriers and area banking officers. Local police
departments also increased patrol coverage of institutions in the
south Miami area. The Miami Office conducted random
surveillances of armored car routes and scheduled deliveries and
saturated the suspect area by quadrant assignment of personnel on
dates considered probable robbery days. It was in the
furtherance of this technique that Agents were assigned
surveillance responsibilities in southwest Miami on April 11,
1966. _
“oncerning this robbery group,
ami Division formulated a plan
am of the bank and armored car
@n attempt to spot the robbers
Snend them. Based on a known modus
* ys as a logical time to activate
this plan. Survei & on two prior occasions had been
unsuccessful in lo the subjects. The squad, utilizing 14
Special Agents, unde e supervision of SSA Gordon G. McNeill,
on April 11, 1986, decided to set up in the area of four banks in
the general southwest section of Miami, where all known prior
activity was centered. This Special Agent complement included
three Resident Agents from the Homestead Resident Agency (RA),
since at least one of the robberies had occurred in their
territory, which is adjacent to the Headquarters City territory
in southwest Miami. All 14 participating Agents had received a
briefing and instructions, and all were familiar with the
backgrounds of each of the preceding robberies. Investigation in
this matter had been closely coordinated with the Metropolitan-
Dade County Police Force; however, no local officers participated
in the April 11, 1986, surveillance activity.
“Ba:
the Reactive
to place &@
robberies ©
en route to
operandi, they #e
Vehicles utilized were Bureau cars belonging to the
squad and to the Homestead RA, and at least one of these vehicles
had radio communications with Metro-Dade County Police radio.
The Agents were armed with their sidearms and a number of the
Agents had shoulder weapons. SA Edmundo Mireles, Jr., and
SSA Gordon G. McNeill both had shotguns in their vehicles, Other
= > oe oes ew a ere be het od
Agents on the surveillance who were not involved in the shooting
were armed with M-16 rifles and submachine guns. All weapons
utilized were Bureau- issued or Bureau-approved weapons and all
of the Agents were fully qualified with the weapons in their
possession. :
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic