Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Fred Hampton — Part 3
Page 160
160 / 251
: Se
Memorandum to The Director
Re: ISERIA HAMPTON, et al., V.
CITY OF CHICAGO, et al.
The state defendan Lts are members of the Cook County
‘States Attorney's Office and members of the Chicago Police
‘Department. The States Attorney's Office centains prosecu-
ting attorneys as well as members of the actual raiding party,
both shooters and non-shooters. The members of the Chicago
Police Department are subdivided into two categeries: the
Crime Laboratory and the Internal Investigations Division.
‘This memo will deal exclusively with the Federal defendants .. =
and the extent that this dscision will affect their liability. ~
Judge suygert, weitiag for the 2-1 majority, sub- ;
@ivides the factual basis of this suit into three distinct -
pericds: pre-raid, raid, and post-raid. Althouch che Fed-
eral defendants were not involveé inthe raid itsel£, Judge
Swygert contends that the Federal defendants were intimately
involved in the pre-raid planning and the alleged post-raid
coverup. Therefore, he holds that the plaintifis have es~ .
tablished a prima facie case of civil liability under Sectiens —
1933 and 1935(3) of the Civil Rights Ret (Title 42, United
nie Coée}); that is, a conspiracy to violate the plaintiffs’
_ Givil rights and actual deprivation ef those richts arising
from the implementation of the conspiratorial plan.
Judce Swygert bases his conspiracy decision xe
garding the Federal defendants on the fact that the FBI
engaged in a Counterintelligence Program (COINTEDPRO) again
the BPP. On pags 34 of the Opinion, £ootnote 20, Judge a
Swygert states: —_ -s 5
Iz should bs noted that when we refer toa
conspiracy arong defendants, we are rot pass-
ing on the ultimate validity of. plaintiffs’
Claims. We merely are commenting on plain-
tiffs' claims and evidence from which a jury ~
reasonably could infer that a conspiracy or
conspiracies ¢xisted
~
(CONTINGED OVER)
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic