◆ SpookStack

TIENT ent ee ae an the seople, to prove that the respondent wis ¢here and took part im tha roboing of thia bunk, en4 the buries of Proof means thet tho party heaving 2%, thet ia the seopl dm this sigs, sust prove their ¢esp, The c¥ople haya made the mecusctiony the seople must prore by evidandcs euffissent to remove @ reusonablg doubt, every essential © clenont of the | offenes she Eads The burien of ao proving is on ‘the Reople. . The enpandant ta act required to prove anything; he te nat - et we . views. raguired to offer any testinany OF any evidense, Tou sta instructed shat the respondent in lew is prasumsa to be innacent and that {¢ devolves, the burden is upon ths seople go prove by evidence, to the astisfaction . SP sseh af the jusore, Beyond am ressonable doudt, that the : rogponiant committed the grins ss eharged in the information and exjlained in these instructions, and ‘if upon a view of thy whaly caga you Bova a gesaomalle doubt af ths rea; ondent ts e.41%, you will give hin the tanefit thorso? and ascuit his, Bub. &@ roassaable doubt to authorize BR SogUIEs ah om that ground nest Le a substantial fault of the wan) ondent ta guilt, foried frome earaful canaidsration of ell tha fects id Sircucst.neve proven i6 tha eiae, and got uo more possitdlity of the dufendun$*s imnggansa., fhe burlen of proof is spon the Feo, lo in this case to shaw the Bullt af the ros;ondeat, gad ald af the prasunp tious ot the law, iodeyendent of She avidenca, ure in favor or his innoconse. rhe law presumes the ragjondaut to be innosant antii he has beon proven ©. gulity beyoud » reasonable doubt; and in thie case the Sour’ dastructs you that if efter you hove asnaidered aii the evidences in tho case you then hova a redeansllie dats aa ta $he getle of the respondent, than the pespondant is w ESP ow ee 4 é x % z