◆ SpookStack

~ * Of souras, if thay rely upen what she told them that is hearsay und should ast bs considered by you, beesuse kre, Rhodes would be thea only perssn who e5uld testify as to whet her recerds show; but of courss, if they remexber the mattor distinetly and rexeaber it iadepencent of their discussion with her, ir you find that. thoy. do Bava such: _ memory, then of course their tasti-ony may te. considered by you, and if you find that their testinony aa to. ‘the date rests sntirely upon ths information that thay got fron Krs, Rhodes, then 1 would say ta you that their testimony ia of no Welue end should pat be considered by you, . how Kr, Doyle, another witness, as you understind is is, Fisaaed in the dt. te aPison in dackson, one of the men adr ivtedly who had port , took part in the:robbing of this bank: ha ‘testifies here that this raspondant wns not one of those that took port in tha roibary,. He rafussa to vive you the namss of uny of those that aid tke pert in the roblery, and it would ofpsur to mo that his testimony ig nat” entitled to ereat welsght,. Hawover, his testimony is a matter for ysu to consider, You ars to pass upon it; you cra to five it such walight as you think it is antitledts, and Fae -Telags of whut 1 think about it, dsesn't huva anything to Go with 40, you cre the sole juuges of whut wai ht his estimony ts to racaiva. _ “Sater oF _ | The testimony af Bre Dekostar ar course has no bearing, as ‘3 aes it, on the matter at ‘all. “He wis in the bank, was aoquainted with the people of the bank, and ons day when he was in thare, he wis there t2 show in goco way that he had a resexblanes ts ons of the robbers, but that in no way connects this situation with this reapondent. how Besides the testimony of thess witnesses, frsts Eos t Ren Bhs @hamay gna tastiiaes phat althouch noigamele | | i a