Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
HEARNAP — Part 9
Page 753
753 / 1139
SPF 7-855
CVWB/cmp
that we were taking no action that might in any way jeopardize
the victim's life, and that this was standard procedure in any
kidnapping cuse.
Later that evening I received a call from one of the
newsmen in town saying that the AP had taken some of my quotes
out of context and had related them to the HEARST case. I
called the AP and told them that they were taking it out of
context and they asked me to tell them in detail what my
comments related to. I did this. They then said they would
wut out a correction. As everyone knows, a correction never
catches up with the original erroneous story.
I am in complete accord with the Director's "open
stance” policy with the news media and am absolutely convinced
that this will benefit the Bureau and its relations with all
of the news media as well as the general public. tlowever,
we must all accept the fact that in such a policy with the
media, there will be occasions when Bureau representatives
will be misquoted or their quotes taken out of context. If
do not feel that this is a basis for changing our position
but it is merely a fact of life with which we have to live.
By and large, I feel that the coverage in the HEARST
case has been good. I think the FBI has benefited. We have
not revealed the investigative techniques, we have not dis-
closed the identities of persons interviewed, and we have
been guided by the Department's instructions when dealing
with the news media. When this case is finally successfully
concluded, I would like to discuss in detail some of the
problems which exist with the press in such a case. This
case is particularly unique because a member of the press
is directly involved.
In this case and in other major cases, hundreds of
media representatives are conducting their own investigation.
There is no reason to belkve that they can't find out infor-
mation as well as the FBI; in some ways, it is easier for
them. As far as the strain on the office itself, it would
be much easier to take a completely no comment stand but
here again I do not believe this is proper. We have had a
number of instances in this case where media representatives
from all over the country have called and furnished us infor-
mation, saying they did not intend to print it but they
wanted to be helpful to us. This information has been taken
and has been run out and, as of the present, nothing of
pertinence has developed.
-2-
TRE ote ‘> ~ - -o¢ a 7
. ~. ~ » oo” _- - - * -_
ae A ATS . “ ow My , cS “
. . ve _ + - ~ - al
- ~ = ee ~ -~ 7 . .
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic