Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
HEARNAP — Part 9
Page 908
908 / 1139
‘a
|
t
|
t
'
QO ©
@ @
SF 7-855
CHW: chw
The typewriting differences observed in the
comparison of the typewriting on Ql through Qi in the
Hearnap case indicate that these specimens may not have been
prepared on the same typewriter as Ql and Q2 (in the Symbionese
Liberation Army; North New mngland Maritimes Action Group case
of the Boston office).
From such limited comparison as could be made,
nothing of particular significance was observed in comparing
the handwriting on Q55 with the writing on items previously
submitted in this (Hearnap) case, the SLA case or the ASGH
Casa. Lee _ _ . — oe
The SLA case referred to in these reports has Bufile
#157-30832 and San Francisco file #152-9806. The ASGM case
aise to has Bufile #157-30190 and San Francisco file #157-
9412 ;
The questioned writing on ook and Q25, submitted by
San Francisco and questioned writing on Q@56 and Q57 reflect
similar writing style, however, due to the presence of
unexplained variations and the possible presence of distortion,
a definite conclusion was not reached whether these items
were or were not prepared by the same person. Nothing of
particular significance was observed in comparing the writing
on Q56 and Q57 with the other questioned writing on items sub-
mitted in this ({Hearnap) case, the SLA case or the ASGM case.
Nothing of particular significance was observed
in comparing the hand printing on Q65, Q67, Q69 and Q90 with
the hand printing on items previously submitted in this
{(Hearnap) case and related cases.
Nothing of particular stenifieance was observed in
comparing the questioned writing on Q76, Q77 and Q78 with
the available writing of NANCY LING PERRY, WMILY HARRIS or
PATRICIA MICHELLE SOLTYSIK. BAY HP kes
From such a limited comparison as could be made,
nothing of part nce was observed in comparing
the writing of re anem remit with the questioned
writing on items in s (Hearnap)case and related cases,
Significant handwriting similerities were observed
in comparing the blue ink questi »ned writing on Q100, the .
questioned handwriting on the lower portion of Q\u2, submitted
B
COVER PAGE
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic