Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
HEARNAP — Part 14
Page 452
452 / 987
= 8 a Opie bee
Page TWO. ot
SF 7-855 \
DETERMINED THEIR CURRENT WHEREABOUTS TO DATE. CONCERNING FEDERAL.
FROCESS FOR JACK AND MICKI SCOTT, NO DECISION TO DATE HAS BEEN
MADE AS TO WHAT PROCESS, IF ANY, WILL BE OBTAINED AGAINST THE
SCOTTS. . |
DURING DISCUSSIONS WITH U. S, ATTORNEY JAMES BROWNING
AT SA” FRANCISCO, HE REFERRED TO A CONFERENCE HELD MARCH 29, 1975
AT WASHINGTON, D.C., ATTENDED BY REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE BUREAU, |
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, pND THE UsS.- ATTORNEY FROM SCRANTON, |
ZHNSYLVANIA, DURING WHICK DISCUSSION WAS HELD CONCERNING OBTAINING
MATERIAL WITNESS WARRANTS FOR THE SCOTTS. ACCORDING TO BROWNING,
THIS MATTER IS BEING PURSUED BY ATTORNEYS PRESENT AT THIS
CONFERENCE, AND THIS MATTER IS BEING FOLLOWED CLOSELY WITH
AROWNING BY THE SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE.
IN ANY EVENT, IT IS APPAPENT THAT THESE WARRANTS WILL NOT
DE FORTHCOMING UNTIL AFTER THE APPEARANCE OF SCOTT'S PARENTS
AND SHINNICK BEFORE THE FEDERAL GRAND JURY AT SAN FRANCISCO ON
APRIL 10, 1975. SAN FRANCISCO FEELS THAT THEIR ISSUANCE AFTER
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic