Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
HEARNAP — Part 17
Page 291
291 / 901
_FROM
SUBJECT:
ya wt which enables us to depose that the defendant has not been i
Prides, 10m wo. 1B mre-iee
ar tas pothGe . ~ ya ‘Sree,
Tha Gin. era. 00. 37 Nn - .
UNITED STATES GC RNMENT © . 2... ae Ae Lie,
M i- Mr. W. leveland AER ice
iu l-Mr. J. A. Mintz ~~. Asft. Dir.:
emoran m 3} - Mr. W. R. Wannall lone on -
1 - Mr. A. B. Fulton Eur atau,
i f 1 - Mr. P. T. Blake ren. tore =
rib
Ly Pad
: B B. Fulton fa nie al a
¥ Leborotory
Pion. & Eval.
Spec. Inv,
SAMPLE AFFIDAVIT REFLECTING Yeoining —.
NEGATIVE SPECIAL INDICES
SEARCH
Lege Cocn, .-
Telephone Rm. .
Pirector Sec’y. .
ABE
The purpose of this memorandum is to consider
whether the court's suggestion concerning. captioned matter
as reported by 6/28/74 San Francisco “HEARNAP" \teletype
(a copy of which is attached) should be adopted.
The teletype notes that United States Attorney
James L. Browning, Jr., San Francisco, California, pointed
out that the Bureau may be interested in a footnote to a court™
jaca sion involving the Patricia Hearst case, which footnote
concerned the testimony of a Departmental attorney to the
effect that he had made inquiries of responsible officials
of the various Government agencies and had learned that the
appellants in this case had not been the subject of any
electronic surveillances. The footnote reads, “Because
{the Departmertal attorney) was not intimately familiar with the (>.
record keepine and practices of other agencies, his testimony
in these respects was of a hearsay nature. As this court noted
at oral argument and emphasizes here, much time, effort, and
expense of parties, attorneys and courts might have been .
spared if the Department of Justice and other investigating a’
agencies had worked out in affidavit form a certificate
disclosing the several agencies’ method of record keeping
in surveillance matters, the method of examination of those
records and that, based upon that examination, the affiant's
statements were made." woman mers eS
The above-suggested procedure would be at vGridkbe2e3 1974
with our current one in that we now furnish an affidavit
stating simply that the records of the FBI do not contin any
indication that the defendant has been party to a coversation :
electronically monitored by the FBI. We do not furnish
information regardiry the method of record keeping or examination .
+ went ce
overheard. Jee 1. yyy i!
Enclosure NNT OO ¢
170 JUL 24 4974 _
RHH: rik CONTINUED ~ CVER nel
(6) . —— _ . oe . 7
84 Jy 260% 7 | | * :
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic