◆ SpookStack

yee usurweiklance: of the witnesses: Drug Enforcerent Adninistra- tion, United States Secret Service, internal Revenue Service | United States. Customs Service, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco 2n | Firearng, and the United States Postal Service; and thet, as /a@ result of those inquiries, the affiant states that "there a7 has been: no electronic surveillances occurring on premises | ‘known to have been owned, leased or. licensed by Jay Weiner, that there was no ‘electronic surveillance*directed against - 2 ings by ie Jay Wei iner..., [and] that there have bee oa We ev shear ee. a 1 ke By’ wation, t« ; which Jay Weiner was a.party. " Alvey' s Shinnick” affidavit | electronic surveillance of conversations, is identical in all material respects, In addition, Gary L. Penrith, Bureau Supervisor at nee -B.T. headquarters, Wash- ington, D. c., submitted anga fidavit to the ‘effect that he © has: been involved in all sspetes, Oe.2 the Hearst investigation since the ‘kidnapping February 4, Tove, and that the or iginal source. of information concerning the alleged activities of Weiner and Shinnfek. in. connection with this investigation was 7 an. individual to whog % one of the alleged participants made statenents and. admissions,” all of which was corroborated by $ q- BO | the testimony of Patricia Hearst during the course of her — trial gat bank robbery charges in San Francisco, California, PR aS "tion. to ower electronic overhearing by the F., BI. , the. t . H 4 governmental agency ‘closest to the inve estigation in ‘this case, to. 1975, through March 20, 1975. ore Lo 7 . Of. eny conversations of the witnesses, Tozether with the. pve ey. affidavit, which sufficiently obviztes the possibi lity a thorized to ‘conduct wiretapping oe eet Am we Ne = OSE RNY eS Sans eS ee oe bel yeKS.