Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Hugo Black — Part 2
Page 110
110 / 121
i whare the Neote Bdge
s\
' 1
t
fat
Sr om eee ME:
Lal in Unanimous. Opinion,
\Says Texas* County’ Barred!
|
L
pectal to Tan New Youx ‘Tuves.*
e Court ‘spanimously?ruled to-
Rnat: ‘exclusion of Negroes from
«, ‘Téxan grand jury wes ‘ground for
reversing the ‘egnviction:of an. 118.
yoareold Negro sentenced: life | im
prlappinent for‘rape. 3 "4. 4
“altect “ofy'the decision is to-
tyo. prisoner after two "years!
ta gait, bacanee of, statute of
tatio “Ug 0 APAPE BITE
apse (ue o wrote the c opin.
Le “Prtkeg qary ly
edpa te of*peing admainigtered
yout racial “Glscrimination, but,
weed, the“ discretion, partaitted
i. lecting grandt jurorg- spud
ap, ed to exclude Negroes. It was
capable,” he akserted, goat this
been done-in .
oon’ oted i
at the- Fourteenth Amend:
ment’ prohibits,’ bg stated, “is ra-
cis¥{dlserimination in thy selection
of; grand juries.” Where jury com-
riissio¢ners mit these from whom
4 jurleavare selected :to “their
re Pcquaintances, discrimina-
oan arise f Fom commissionars j
y know ac'iNefroee as well as.
tr oomm ioners me knoy y but
j Sbrfed Vom ths gusy.
2 Race From Grand ‘Juries 7 Wydegree, ~ DS
le Va; verde? leew
“kK Is*Negro'’s Advoonte™
‘Riack hax been"proniineat | £*
asserting | the ‘basic:
Tights of Negroes. In “February, ’.
1930, he wrote’ an, opinion waving &.
Louisiana”, Negro from, ‘the fdeath’
sentence “because his race’ was.
: Rast Taken,
a a A |
i ’ HUOURE Lub ent ener Bi
haerad fram the durv.
ary, the ‘court, in an’ opinion’ by!
him, overturned the convictions of;
‘four Florida Negroes ‘when evidence
showed they endured . a hareh: third
a “ee
= &tat a eo ene me
Ao Alabaman, he stood aside. when
the Supreme Court acted onthe
“) case of the ‘Scottsboro boys’ . be-
Ku Klaux Klan at the time of his
appointment.” The attitude, of Jus-
SHINGTON, Noy. 25—The ‘ cause of the controversy over’ ths
tracted wide attention, ~ a
| After handing’ down the /Black
opinion and four others and fesuing}-
the usual formal orders, the court
recessed from the bench until Dec. |
— One of the orders, refuged «to |
grant a teat of the’ “common ‘eon-{
trol" features of the Georgia Un-
wiemployment Compensation Law,
while another granted a review ‘to,
the Fashion” Originators Guild,
which has been charged by the Fed.)
era] Trade Commission with mo-
istic practices. Ml
the Edgar Smith case, Justice.
Black repeated testimony. lo show
that Negroes had long been ox-
ded from the grand jury in Har’:
ris County, which includes Hous-
ton. Negroes, he stated, cons
’
county population and. almoat.. 10,
per cent of ‘the poll-tax payers. A
minimum of 3,000 to 6,000, he sqded,
til qualifications: for, gvand». “JUr¥| variably appeared as No. 16, and
Beet at
de tt
wervice. * ‘
The, court
1091-28, inclusive,” only five of thel
were Negroes; of 512 persons
for grand jury duty, only eighteen
they Negroes; of these eighteen
Lise aes
ees “Pu Bnet
j] ‘Black,
tice Black in “these caser ‘has
tuted more than 20 per cent of the:for jury service.
“ elerk, saids Justice) called for service unless it proved
Black: testified, however, that’ in! impossible to obtain the required
te ndmant,
a0 2b thirteen n Appears of Texas dent ad the
INDEXED Zee-O ak
”
al
4,
&.
it tom baing to “ehoos® the
et thon ing in the order
a mee es trae Heb ed
at tha NAMES WEES aie
“Tt in part of the established tra-
dition in the use of juries aa instru-
‘manta of public justice that the jury
“be a body truly representative ot
the community,” -said Justice
“For racial disctimination
‘to result in the exclusion from jury
nervice of otherwise qualified
groups not only violates our Con-
stitution and the Jaws enacted un-
der it but is at war with our basic].
concepts of a democratic society, .~
and @ representative government.
No-Biss Law “Not Enough” |
‘We must consider this record in
the light of these important prin-
ciples, The fact that the written;
words of a State's laws hold out a
promise that no auch ‘discrimina-
it ha
tion will ba practiced is not enough.
The Fourteenth Amendment re-
quires thet equal protection to all
must be given—not merely promised,
“Here, the Texas statutory scheme
ie not in itself unfair; it is capable
of being cerried cut with no racial
‘discrimination whatsoever. But by
reason of the wide discretion per-
missibia in the various steps of the
plan. it is equally capable of being
applied in such & manner as prac-
tically to proscribe any group
thought by the law's administrators
io be undesirable. And from t
ANG from thie
lrecord pefore us the conclusion is|*
inescapable that it is the latter ap-
plication that, has prevailed in Har-
‘vis County, ~
“Chance and accident alone ‘coul:
hardly have brought about the !
ding for grand jury services of so few |
Negroes from among the thousands ;
shown by the undisputed evidence :
assess tha legal qualifications
Nor could chance
and accident have been responsible
for the combination of clreum-
which a Negro’s
ten ta
atances $tnder
name, when listed at all, almost in-
under which, No. 16 was never
jurors from the first fifteen names
es ee et
BH othe sit.
| 384 grand jurors in that period| ‘The convicted man pleaded that!
calledithe “systematic” exolusion of Ne-:
gross denied him the right of equal
protection guaranteed by the vour
"Lhtentiindar-:
YORK TIMES 1/38/40.
trary exclusion. “Two of the tpree
comlaticee who dywdre” Sep-
tem’! grand jury pene] afi-
mitted that they did not “pelect any
Negross, although the’ subject was
discussed, but, they continted, thers
Waa n0 arbitrary discrimination.
The Black decision reversed the
Texas Court of Criminal Apeals.
which bad afifrmed the conviction
in the trial court, “Both of the
Texas courte held that the evidence
failed to support the charge of ta-
cial discrimination. aan
cn:
’,,, Georgia ‘Review Is Refused
By The Associated Press.
WASHINGTON, Noy. 25—The Su-
Preme Court refused today to fe-
i view a Georgia Bupreme Court dect-
sion which State officials saserted
would “seriously endanger” the
administration of unemploymert-
compensation brogyams of thirty-
three States. ~
The decision barred. ‘the State
from lumping concerns under the
same ownership into a single unil
to determine whether there were
enough employes to warrani the
éollection of assessments under tat
unemployment compensation stat
ute,
A 1837 Georgia law permitted as
sezsstnents against such cor ern
if, together, they employed slant ol
more persons. .
Texas Wil Release Smith
- By The Associated Press,
GUSTON, Texas, Nov. 2-—F.
ar Smith, a Negro, ‘whose lif
imprisonment conviction on a char;
of criminal assault was set asij
*today by the United States Supre
‘Court, will be freed from the 24
County jall in a few days. He
been held since Aug. 1, 1938, ap
now 20 years old, ‘
Court attaches here said ¢
cause the atatute of Hmltat]
the. charge is one year in
Smith cannot pee reindl
therefore wil ba freed
Hippeaeionl 4 from, one
Court arrives, ”
ra
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic