Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
J Edgar Hoover — Part 19
Page 233
233 / 240
e@ ¢ @
be made of the testimony, and there is to be a submission of
of the transcribed testimony to the witness, and the officer
taking the deposition is to file the same.
Further, undcr Rule 31 a party, other than the
Party serving the written questions, has the right to serve
eross-questions on the witness. -
In sum, the procedure for examining a party by
written interrogatories under Rule 33 differs materially from
the procedure of examining a non-party by taking a deposition
upon written questions under Rule 31. Plaintiff's efforts to
utilize the Rule 33 technique is misdirected, and for that reason
Plaintiff's interrogatories to Jeanne Mohr Scott should be
quashed.
HOGAN & HARTSON
By
I Frank F. Roberson
Bar No. 10827
~_? 2 -
By cc? ~ —
-Robert J. Elliott
/Bar No. 056846
815 Connecticut Avenve, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
331-4500
' Attorneys for
Defendant John P. Mohr
Ore aewe
Screen &.¢ pee
HOGAN 4 HARTSON
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic