◆ SpookStack

ee me ae ee a ee a aN RE * * Section Tf in explicit language states that employees shali have the rights therein exuerated. Legislative history ef the Act makes it elear that theese righte are sequred only the employer er those in scunivance with him. {hese rights are ®aceured by the laws of the Dnited Staten” within the moaning Ne reported gase applica Beetion 6) te the rights secured by shiz statute, but in two unreported onses, district courts have everruled dewurrers te indictments, U.3. ¥. mt Belen Geel Eake evelving wee of bengien Kired by saplopers te tleert wnien activity, However, application ef Seotion 6] te eonspirasies by indi- viduals, as opposed to persons acting under state authority, is established beyond question. Mesreet parelie] te the present ense ie U. @. We Waddell, 112 U.8. 76 (eonspiracy by individuals to deny @ eltisen exereles of statutory rights under the Pederal Homestead Act). Other applications ef Seetion 5) te eonspirasics Wy individuals are; smith we U. 8-, 167 Fed. Tal, ert. den. 808 " YeS. G16 (right to de free from Involuntary servitude); Logan v. Us Se, 144 UoSs 263 (right te be free from violeness while Tustody of United states Marshal)s In Re les, 158 ¥.8. 688, and ywotes v. U. 8., 178 U.8. 458 (right te Talore of violation of federal laws)? Foss ve U. O., 266 Fed. G8) (right to testify before « land offise)) VU. Bu'Vr Lancaster, 64 Fed. 685 (right ¢s be protested in exeaution of federal dsaree). “ ISSUE OF FAC? . sole iseue of fact te whether ERM payment by the union effieials ta Rishoff was made with in uee Blshoff te impose unfair labor practices upon his employees, menbers of a rive] unica. oe CIROUMSTANCES INDICATING GUILTY ‘eee * 3, Coineidense of ogress ve Ons e ee quiring further investigation, are mar. a.