Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John Handsome Johnny Roselli — Part 6
Page 8
8 / 181
KC $68-75
.
the Beer la Ran ha alade «a Atati nn ths aaalbat sho win the aa te that
sw £M@evi Wo osr Macs s a Hete; Woh Uae Mela Ne et Pa wie wie’ We wh w
wa mam
he is recommending to the other members of “the Parole Board thet this inma
be paroled, or he makes a notation that parole is denied or continued to
Washington. At the completion of the hearing the docket is then sent to
Washington, D. S.
te
advised that where a date is set for recommendation of
release by parole, his office then starts to develop parole plans for the
inmates, even though the granting of the parole is dependent on further action
af the Parola Board in Washington, hn. a. The inmate is not notified of the
ese we apa
action taken by the interviewing Parole Board member at this tims.
Subsequently, the docket is returned to the inetitution signed by
another Parole Board member, and this makes the original recommendations of
the interviewing Board member official. In some instances, of course, the
recommendation of the Parole Board member that handled the interviews may
not be accepted, and different notations will appear on the docket.
Fo advised with rapard to tha twelve oaasas mantioned in
the references teletype, that it is possible some of these inmates could
have been released on the scheduled date given by the Parols Board if their
cases had been handied by telephone or telegraph, and in other instances the
release could not have been met, no matter what moans nication was
used, due to complications of the particular coco, SR <0 that
with respect to the decision as to whether or not a telegram is to be sent
or telaphone call made in expediting the parole plans.in order to release an
inmate on the effactive date, an individual Parole Officer has cartain ceases
assigned to him and, if the Parole Officer in his opinion feels that matters
can be expedited by using the telephone or a telegram, the Officer discusses
his should be done, he then takes
the case with him and, if he t
the case up with the warden. iti. :::::: that the authorization of
the warden or whoever is acting warden.in the-absence of the warden, is _gb-
solutely necessary in order to handle a case by telephone or telegram. cin
a advised thet telephone calls and televrams are made only to
on Officers and the Board of Parole in Washington, D. C., as a general
rule, in attempting to have all arrangements made to release an inmate on the
effective date set by the Parole Board.
Wa ::::-: that with respect to nat:
the institution had twelve days notice inorder to make arrangements for his
release. Hoe advised that on August 6, 1947, the prison was advised that
possibility of employment oft the Lamarr Creamery Company of Paris,
Texas, wes turned down by the améry in response to a letter from the
prison dated July 31, 1947. This'case was then referred to the Employment
Placement Unit at the prison, who made gements with the Texas Unomploy-
ment Compensation Commission to assist on arrival at his home in
Paris, Texas, in finding employment,
_ b? c
a A set oe, Fre a te a ea “ae ie = : e ra mene pape Pe tig | $e
DN ear ROS, pret tne eae mores eee Se ee ee
Ce eR YE ee af ie ee
2 ee Ne = PT we
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic