Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Mississippi Burning MIBURN Case — Part 1
Page 70
70 / 129
Memorandum to Mr, Belmont
Re: UNKNOWN SUBJECTS;
MICHAEL HENRY SCHWERNER, ET AL
our reports clearly set forth the names of the individuals who can
testify and the type of information that they can receive. He said
he thought we should have this assurance so that his attorneys
would not be going into the grand jury without fully being aware
of all of the facts. I know of no information which was obtained
through the means of telephone taps or other illegal means and
consequently the statement given to Katzenbach is correct.
He then brought up a question which has previously been
raised by Burke Marshall, It is recalled that Burke Marshall stated
in connection with the finding of the bodies of the three civil rights
workers by the FBI it is just incredible as to how the Agents were able
to find the boys in the location they did based solely upon an intensive
search of the area. He said he was not asking me for an answer but
he felt that if this case does go to trial certainly Katzenbach or Marshall
ought to be aware of the facts so that they would not be caught by surprise
or take action which was undesirable, Marshall indicated that this ought
to be given some thought by the Bureau and that he was not asking me for
any answer, I did not volunteer any answer. This was reflected in my
memorandum of September 3, 1964, in the instant case,
AY eed
It was suggested,that there did not appear to be any reason
for changing our position at that time; however, if this matter is
pursued by the Department and the question comes up again, it was
believed the Bureau under no circumstances should disclose information
which we must retain in full and complete confidence, If we have to
disclose anything further than what has already been said, the most we
could tell Marshall or the Attorney General, whoever it may be, on the
basis that £ is to be solely for their information alone and is not to be
disclosed to anyone else as it does not effect the presentation of the
civil rights cases, is that "We were able to secure information leading
to the location of the bodies; however, the source cannot be disclosed, “
Insofar as this suggestion 5 concerned, the Director indicated that we
ail aan faan thic arcenin fawn an anawaT 7, wWA Asn Nracana
Wiha. LWilLOLts Libin apeatu aur, Gill anowes. re @iw Ra ih? he 3
—
a on oa
Katzenbach has now referred to Marshall's question and has
indicated that he would appreciate an answer inasmuch as the attorneys | .
who are presenting this case should not be asking questions of
individuals as there is a possibility of perjury arising. I told
Sratuimiotamininammteretatmetsn deta toe Petree cen cae te mmntarrentaeaEtefnn 4
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic