Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
National Organization for Women NOW — Part 3
Page 31
31 / 41
” ABORT
The ‘landmark decision handed down by the
‘ California Supreme Court in September, 1969
declaring California's over 100-year old
abortion laws unconstitutional (People vse.
‘Dr. Leon P. Belous) established the vital
legal precedent for swift filing of. suits
dn other states. Roy lucas, Director of
the James Madison Constitutional Law In-
stitute and a member of NARAL's board,
spearheaded a stellar group of ACLU attor-
neys in New York. In a joint action to be
heard before a three-judge federal court, _
_ several prominent physicians, nurses, in~
dividual married and unmarried women, min-
dsters, social workers and psychologists
filed a complaint against the Attorney
| ‘General of New York State, the District
Attorneys of New York, Bronx and Kings
Counties, two major New York hospitals and
the hospital sbortion committees of same.
This case will be argued in the near fut~
pre. A decision can take up to nine months
and whether we prevail or not, the case will
go to the U.S. Appeals Court and subse-
quently to the U.S. Supreme Court for ree
| wiew and final. ruling.
November, 1969, shortly after the New
York suit was filed, District Judge Qerbard
A. Gesell, washington, D.C., ruled in Peo-
ple vs. Dr. Milan Vuitch that the abortion
| Jaws of the District of Columbia were un-
constitutional and invalid in line with the
_ Belous precedent. Judge Gesell requested
swift u.S, Supreme Court review of his rul-
ing which leaves the District of Columbia
without criminal sanctions against the per-
Toning of abortions by a licensed physi-
BNie
Events moved swiftly. The California
1967 Therapeutic Abortion "reform" Act was
successfully challenged and invalidated.
Mast, Santa Ana, California, dismissed a-
bortion charges against Dr. R. C. Robb of
' Dana Point, California, Judge Mast ruled
that a woman has the constitutional right
not to bear children, and held the 1967
Therapeutic Abortion Act unconstitutional.
Orange County District Attorney Cecil Hicks
plans to appeal the case. The Belous case
was filed in 1965, prior to enactment of
the peutic Abortion Act, and
therefore Dr. Belous was not charged under
this law. However, the California Supreme
Court in handing down its opinion in Sept.
1969 used language indicating that the 1967
_ de alert to
ION LAW “ePKAL GATHERS SPEED
Act would prove {nvalid and unconstditution-
al under proper court challenge. alt is
this challenge which has now been success-
Pally made.) Unless the California Su-
Court should decide to review its
own recent findings, it is likely Calif-
ornia will shortly be in the sam position
Washington, D.C, is enjoying pending final
ruling by the U.S. Suprems Court.
uther cases are stockpiling rapidly.
In Renton, Washington, Dr. A. Frans Koane
has directiy informed Governor Dan Evans
of his decision to openly do a specified
number of abortions in his office each
week in a direct challenge to the consti-
tuvionality of Washington abortion laws.
This case is being prepared by his attor-
ney, David Hood of Seattle, for presenta-
tion to a federal court.
More than four hundred women have filed |
@ joint action in New York Federal Court,
demanding their rights to proper abortion
care. Some have signed effidavits testi-
fying to their own dliegal abortions, this
leading to possible prosecution of them
under existing laws. Another similax group
of women plan a joint suit in San Francisa
Plans are going forward in California to
place the repeal of abortion laws on the
1970 ballot through an initiative, There
are doubtless other actions, not reported -
here, but equally vital to our movenent
for repeal.
NARAL 4s working towards immediate oper —
ing of a clinic in Washington, Dc This
clinic will be staffed by certified ob-
1g and nurses, and will operate on an
out-patient basis, Services will be of-
fered at minimal or no charge to women
unable to pay. The direct aim is to demon-
strate clearly that hospitalization is not
required in early terminations of preg-
nancy wnder normal conditions of health of
the patient.
With the foreseeable repeal of criminal
sanctions against abortion, all NOW, NARAL
and other interested repeal groups should
% rewriting of state abor-
tion laws in the guise of “protective” ~~
laws requiring abortion to be an accred-
ited hospital procedure.
‘Yana Clarke Phelan is oy
‘NATIONAL cHareman —west |
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic