Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
National Security Letters — Part 1
Page 350
350 / 1188
store and retain communications data for up to two years.” In acknowledging the need
for dala retention requirements, the EU Parliament and Council recognized that:
retention of data has proved to be such a necessary and
effective investigative tool for law enforcement in several
Member States, and in particular concerning serious
matters such as organised crime and terrorism, it is
necessary to ensure that retained data are made available to
law enforcement authorities for a certain period, subject to
the conditions provided for in this Directive.”
EPIC’s recommended data destruction mandate would cause the Commission to
regress to a course it has long since rejected. If anything, reliance on telephone call
records as an investigative resource to protect public safety and national security has only
increased and become more critical in the almost twenty years since the Commission
revised Section 42.6 of its rules to extend the telephone records retention period.”
Notwithstanding this increased reliance on such records, however, the efficacy of the
Commission’s current Section 42.6 requirement to meet law enforcement needs has been
significantly eroded.
While the risks are clear and many, the benefit from a mandatory destruction
requirement is largely unclear and certainly limited. The mandatory destruction of some
3 See Council Directive, 2006/24/EC, 2006 O.F. (L 105) 54, Article 6 (“Directive’’),
viewable at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/JOHtml do?uri=OJ-L: 2006: 105:som:en:html.
See also Mirtam H. Wugmeister and Karin Retzer, Data Retention — implications for
Business, 7 NO, 2 Privacy & Info. L. Rep. 7 (2006).
4 See Directive at 4 99.
25 Moreover, as the Commission notes in the Notice, carriers themselves have
already expressed concern about potential conflicts with Commission rules that require
that call records and other CPNI be kept for at least a minimum period of time. See
Notice {| 20 (noting carriers’ comments that destroying records might conflict with the
Commission's Part 42 record-keeping rules, 47 C.F.R. §42.01-11).
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic