Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
National Security Letters — Part 1
Page 404
404 / 1188
We visited four FBI field offices and reviewed a sample of 77 investigalive case files
and 293 NSLs. We found 22 possible violations that had not been identified or reported
by the FBI.
We have no reason to believe that the number of violations we identified in the field
offices was skewed or disproportionate to the number of violations in other files. This
suggests that the large number of NSL-related violations throughout the FBI have not
been identified or reported by FBI personnel.
{n one of the most troubling findings, we determined that the FBI improperly obtained
telephone toll billing records and subscriber information from three telephone companies
pursuant to over 700 so- called exigent letters. These letters generally were signed by
personnel in the Communications Analysis Unit, the CAU, a unit of the Counterterrorism
Division in FB] headquarters.
The exigent letters were based on a form letter used by the FBI's New York Field
Division in the criminal investigations related to the September I lth attacks.
FINE:
Our review found that the FBI sometimes used these exigent letters in non-emergency
circumstances. In addition, the FBI failed to ensure that there were authorized
investigations to which the requests could be tied.
The exigent letters also inaccurately represented thai the FBI had already requested
subpoenas for the information when in fact it had not. The FBI also failed to ensure that
NSLs were issued promptly to telephone companies after the exigent letters were sent.
Rather, in many instances, after obtaining records from the telephone companies, the
FBI issued national security letters months after the fact to cover the information
obtained.
We concluded that the FBI's use of these exigent letters inappropriately circumvented
the requirements of the NSL statute and violated attorney general guidelines and FBI
policies.
In response to our report, we believe that the department and the FBI are taking our
findings seriously. The FBI concurred with all our recommendations and the department's
National Security Division will be actively engaged in oversight of the FBI's use of
NSLs.
In addition, the FBI's Inspection Division has initiated audits of a sample of NSLs
issued by each of its 56 field offices.
The FBI is also conducting a special investigation on the use of exigent letters to
determine how and why the problems occurred.
The OIG will continue to review the FBI's use of national security letters. In addition
to issuing a second report on the use of NSLs in 2006, we intend to monitor the actions
that the FBI and the department are taking to address the problems we found in that
review.
Finally, | want to note that the FBI and the department cooperated fully with our
reviews, agreed to declassify information in the report, and appear to be committed to
addressing the problems we identified.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic