Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sempra Energy — Part 1
Page 17
17 / 42
Q
UNCLASSIFIED
To: San Diego From: San Diego
Re: SD 205-0, 02/17/2011
counter party would sign the contract. If the vendor was a sole
source, a form was signed by a supervisor one level above. There
was no follow-up to inspect the books and records of vendors
Sempra used. Once a vendor was appr > & purchase reauest for
that vendor was signed by a supervisor and procurement
representative. Any request over $50,000 required legal review.
Before payment was made to the vendor for products or services
received, a certification by the receiver was needed. There have
been no red flags found in the procurement process, but any
vendor concerns would come to the attention of the Controller.
To knowledge, Sempra does not maintain "due diligence"
files on its vendors in Mexico.
ew
attende the
never voiced any
During balance Snéet réviews, the bond
y General's (AG ice for the
never came up. [oTeecane aware of
the bond in ntroller of
Mexico informed aske the bond documents
be is personal email account. conf
in San Diego office about the request.
responded that h d to cover himself and hav ents
for his records. asked if something was wrong wi
transaction, but receiv direct response from
result of this re
filed a lawsuit.
that it had been properly accounted for, all documentation
available, ck to the bank.
became Cont er oO , ne scrubbe € account
find and fix errors.
for seven
annual FCPA trai
FCPA/concerns to
eviction o
As a
The fifth matter presented addressed the question of
whether the MX$100,000 bond paid to the Ensenada AG's Office in
2006 was, still pending. [ [provided a copy of a certified
document issued by the AG's office dated 02/10/2011 advising that
the MX$100,000 was being reimbursed and was on its way back to
Sempra. — asked to know the status of the DOJ and SEC's
investigation of the bond allegation. He expressed t the
negative media attention being generated i ne ea
accusati e embarrassing to Se needed to
€ put to bed. | [advised that there did not e
any need to further investigate the matter and thet] |
UNCLASSIFIED
6
b7C
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic