Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy — Part 28
Page 32
32 / 46
rT.
CONGRESSIONAL JCORD—S
1950
Case No, 46.15 the case of a man who A report dated Jus, 18, 1947, states tha
holds a high position in the State De- Hin 1941 a Senate investigating committe
partment. He had been affiliated with Mifhad found that both this individual an
er husband were members of the Co
the magazingfAmerasia from Muay 1937
unlst Party. A report dated September
to November 1941. “This magazine con-
sistently followed the Communist Party @ag5. 1947, by a Government investigative
line. was under the direction of gency, advised that a reliable informant
+
Phi sit and William Vanderbilt eported this ind{fvidual as a Commu-,
Field. "rield has been a Rading Commu-
nist and was one of the Treads of the
American Peace Mobilization, which the
President and the Secretary of State
publicly labcled as a tool of communism.
Jaffe, as Senators will recall, was con-
victed and fined in connection with the
John Service incident. It will be re-
called that the FBI picked up Service for
having delivered secret State Depart-
TT.
auii
ontac{ine & member of the Soviet es-
iona Ting. This individual fa still
n 8 highly paid job in the State De-
partment.
Cases Nos. 48 and 49. One of these
dividuals Ts in the Department
wife ts with the State Department
the Division of Research and Intell
The fle shows that both the htis
monte Ancumente tn Brmeracta
Bris UACUMICTIIS wo AMicrasia.
State Department files shew that this ind
dividua) has been working very closely
with these two men. On arch 22,
19486, the State Department's own 3
ence,
associates of individuals Jinked with
oviet esplonage activities. Neverthe]
the wife was approved for top-secret ma
terial on the lith of February 1947. Th
order approving her is rather unusual
in that it states, in effect, that the reaso
for her being approved for top secre’
material was that there was insufficient,
information to warrant her discharge
grounds of disloyalty. .
se N This individual is
executive secretary in the State Depart
ment. He has been reported by anothe
vernment investigative agency as hay-
ing been in contact with a Soviet espton-
SV -
rity agency recommended as follows:
It ie recommended that action be insti-
tuted to terminate subject's service with the
Btate Department. It ls suggested to achieve
this purpote that an eppropriate officer of
the Department should iufofm him that his
pontinued presence in the Department is em-
barrassing 1o the Department and that he
be given an opportunity to resign. If bh
should not resign voluntarily, action ehoul
he instituted under Civil Service Rule No,
12, tO termloate his services with the De-
partment.
The Department, however, took no 1%
tion upon this recommendation. 2
After that recommendation, the files
show that this individual requested a
fellow traveler to seek a position with the
Board of Economic Warfare. The fila that he was responsible for the Btate
further shows that this individual has Department's having employed an in-
been visited on several occasions by an ™ @ividual in one of the cases which I cov-
alien fellow traveler. He has also rec-“@ereq earlier today. It will be recalled
ommended TWO former empsoyees Of the @ tha: No. 14 was the case of an individual
Amerasia Editorial Board to positions raving furnished material to a known
with the State Department. In othe! ecret espionage ring and Who had con
words. Mr. President, the usual tact! :stent contacts with long lists of Com-
of getting Into an important positic .unists and Suspected Soviet agents. He
and then bringing in fellow Communist « still holding an important position in
A report dated August 18, 1947, re the State Department.
torded an interview with a former me
Case No. 52. This individual works for
ber of the Editorial Board of Amerasia Nott that is the correct num-
who labeled this Individual as “far to the .
feft—awtfully lowe to a fellow traveler.'’* ber-—who, the State Department files
This individual was a subscriber torthe
Daily Worker. The file names a Commu- a8 This
nisi Party member who has twice worked —
for this individual. The Biographic
Register of the State Department show
him to be still in a position of importance
there.
ase No 47. This individual was em
Joyed in Match 1944, as Division Assis
nt in the Division of Interna) Securit
he House Un-American Activities Com
ittee advised on August 18, 1947, tha
n admitted former Communist Part
ember was formerly assoctated with
His individual in Communist activities
n Washington, D.C. This individual's
usband admitted having been a mem-
eT of the Communist Party. The hus-
and now has a highly confidential posl-
ion with the Navy Department. The &1
ndicates that this individual has bee
sociated with a group of Known Com.
unists.
Eeep in mind, Mr. President, that sh
# Was given a Job in the Division of In
G ternal Becurity.
two employees of the State Department
who are under investigation because of
Communist associates.
eN This individual agreed
espionage agents in the Department.
indi
‘ederal investigative agéncy. He apg
his wife are also close associates of tuo
other alleged eeplonage agents who sare
named in the State Department files. He
s presently holding a high-salaried and
important position in the State Depart-
ment and has been given, top-se
clearance.
Here ts :
fact, they are all important. This is
. No. 63 involving an individual
who has been named by a confessed
Communist spy as part of his spy ring.
Prior to that time, on August 19, 1946,
nother governmental agency received
ormation to the effect that he was a
cognized leader of the Communist
underground. This individual is, in my
pinion, Mr. President, one of the most
dangerous Communists in the Btate
Department.
the Division of Occupied Areas. Thelle:ho was also a Communist.
ATH 2067
3 Case No 54. This faividual has been
connected with a number of Communist-
front organizations and was aéttve in
attempting to secure the issuance of s
nonimmigration visé to a French Come
murist leader. This individual is pres-
ently employed in the State Department.
ases Ng 55. ‘rhis individual was «
close friend and associate of ap indi-
vidual described earlier in the day. It
Will be recalled that he was 6 very close
associate of Soviet agents. A previous
nplover of this individual described her
as having been “wrapped up” in commu-
ism and that she later married a man
The files
of the Department show that "she and
her husband are contacts of a subject in
the —— espionage case.” The case re-
and and wife are known to be cl ferred to is a recent and very important
Communist case.
aS This individual was born
in Russia and naturalized in San Fran:
cisco in 1929. Two former supervisors on
non-Government Jobs had recommended
him unfavorably. The only favorabl
reTerence he had was from three Russiarh
Individuals, all in Government employ-
ent. He roomed with one of the Rus-
éjans who had recommended him. The
Navy Department informed the State
Department that this Individual had
secret State Department documents in
the room shared by him and the other
Russian. An investigation was institut-
ge agent. Fle is also a close friend of @ ed, the outcome of which I do not know.
However, this individual was still in
the State Department as Jate as Decem-
ber 1949.
Case No . This individual was em-
Ployed by the State Department in 1946
a P-7 consultant. On June 7, 1946,
&5
4: Government Trvestigative agency ad-
vised that this individual was the contact
an for a Russian espionage ring.
This report also included information
o the effect that he had played bridge
amd exchanged Isanguage lessons with
persons in the Soviet Embassy. On Juna
7. 1946, the same Investigative agency
reported that a known Soviet espionage
agent was arrested with his wife in Fin-
Jand in the 1930's and that while in cus-
tody this espionage agent's wife has re-
quested the American Consul to forward
on her behalf a request for funds from
in charge of the training of Boviet
marines at one time at a Russian port,
Nevertheless, this individual, on Septem -
ber 11, 1947, was given top secret clear-
ance. The clearance officer in this case
Bald:
In the absence of additional highly deroga-
tory information J feel that top secret clear-
Qnce should be given.
T have been unable to find out whether
this individual is working with the State
Department at the present time, and,
if not, whether he is in private or Gov-
ermmment employment.
Mr. LEHMAN. Mr. President, will the
Benator yield? -
Mr. McCARTHY. Certainly.
Mr, LEHMAN. I should Uke to ask
the Senator from Wisconsin whether he
has submitted the names represented by
the reports he has read and the other
approximately 250 names to which ref-
erences have been Made? Has he sub=
be
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic