◆ SpookStack

ae Wend 3 2 3 * Be | 3 =z i @: 3 Weg Yt Here Near Sem etd Me niga - re ied in a ~ ‘“ AtatKta Lloyd Ecfore__.___> _ Lloyd was a target of Mc- Carthy’s charges in 1950. He said at that time that McCarthy had simply revived unfounded charges against his loyalty which grew out of a 1947 report made to a House committee. Lloyd said last night ihat he does not know enough about Loyalty Review Roard proce-! dures (9 discuss (hem. “F did answer all quesitons put to me in a sworn staiement,” he «aid. “Tll answer all others at any time. T have nothing to conceal. Tam proud of my record. ‘If Senator MeCarthy wants jme to provide him with any | information,” Lloyd said, “he has only to call me up on the tele-; | phone.” . McCarthy. in his charges, against Service, did not in any way indicate the identily of the “individual” he said Service was j “living with” before Service's return from the Far East in 1945. ; The State Department, said McCarthy, put out a “deceptive press release” at the time Serv- tee was dismissed in whiclt it! stated the only question in his: loyalty case involved giving in-! formation in 1945 to the editor j of the now defunct magazine | Amerasia. McCarthy eontended: “There was no question raised | about the accuracy of the. in- formation that he (Service) was; living with this individual. No' question that this individual was were Loyalty Review Board Mi&- utes, McCarthy quoted Lawren ¥. Meloy, executive secretary, stating: “They (he State Department} are taking the attitude that they are there to clear the employe, and nol to protect the Govern-! ment.” In the Service case McCarthy said that two of the three origi-. nal State Department Loyalty-| Security Board members, who he | said were “inclined to hol against" Service, were trans | a paid Soviet agent.” & |ferred ta nther work before th ' In reading from what he said decision was due, + —_——