◆ SpookStack

ee ae & Pe kines ea hh 1 wey < tee wee 8 in Jones vs-Willian H.Rehnquist,et al., Due March 15,1995 and to avoid Impeachment,Removal from Office,Tired Convicted and Imprisoned for its ongoing pattern of crimes,sanctioned = to weemevree 5 oh erent 2 a emma = meee . lower courts orders denying Appellant right. to P-A-Y Filing fee and File Civil Rights complaint(S), Litigate ? And WHETHER, pursuant to Conley vs.Gibson, 355 US 41 (1957); Haines vs. Kerner, 404 US 519 (1972), Appellant should be allowed to offer Supporting Evidence to support his Claims which would entitle him to. relief ? The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States Guarantees: every person therein the right to petition the gov- ernment for redress of grievances, freedom of speech,these rig- hts includes [ Access to Court, Right to be Heard,Offer Suppor- ting Evidence on his/her claims, and the right to prevail bas- ed on doctrine of Preponderance-of-evidence ] no judge or jus- tice of the United States courts has the power vested in them under Article III of the Constitution t6 deny any person: these Guarantedd Rights,as these Appellees have done through multit- ude criminal conspiracies and criminal overt acts for the past {Twenty One(21) Consecutive Years With Impunity],for the sole purpose to coverup and concea? these Class A Felony Crime(S) _committed and day-by-day being committed by them heretofore, in which to silence Appellant by [ Stripping him of all rights under the Constitution,and isstiing orders that forever denied him access to court,whether. he P-A-Y Filing fees,or motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 USC § 1915 J The federal district court en banc did issued Two(2) Fraudu- -23-