◆ SpookStack

) O exceeded the scope of all jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution,and contrary to 28 USC § § 453 and 455 et seq. Rule 52(a) trial judge shall explicitly state findings of far ct and Conclusions of Law upon which the judgment,order is ba- sed.The requirement that judge make findings of fact and con- clusions of law is "Mandatory," and the findings M-U-S-T be sufficient to indicate the factual basis for the ultimate co- nelusion, Liddell vs-Board of Education of the City of St-Lo- uis, 20 F 3d 326(8th Cir.1994),the judge need not address all the evidence,but must address the ultimate evidence,which were knowingly bypassed herein.Leaque of United Latin American Cit- izens,Council No.4424 vs.Clements, 986 F 2a 728(5th cir.1993). 3.Proceedings covered by rule: Rule 52 requires findings of fact and conclusions of Law in trials with. advisory juries, Transmatic Inc.vs-.Fulton Industries,Inc., 53 F 3d 1270(Fed. Cir.1995),On the cation of Appellant's Complaint(S) Demanded Trial by Jury,as of Constitutional right under Seventh Amen-~ dment and Rule 38 Fed.R.Civ.P.,That form of demand were cle- arly set forth as required by the Rule,Early vs-Bankers Life and Casualty Co., 853 F Supp.268(N.D-ILL.1994),Rule 52 also applies to motions for summary judgments under Rule 56,motio-— ns under Rule 12(b), see e.g.,Souza vs-Paina, 53 F 3d 423(1st Cir.1995),also as to dismiss,to include the independent use of the Rule Sua Sponte by trial judge.No excuse can be made by judge's deliberate failure to follow the Rules,as requir- ed by all other parties,here a "Rush To Judgment" by judge, Stiehl attempting to block Appellees answering to the Compl- -13-