◆ SpookStack

oO e) respect to the FCC that Appellant informed of these crimes,and demanded affirmative action,which were ignored by FCC Officia-— ls,aiding and abated the continuous pattern of crimes commi- tted by officers of the federal courts,Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri [ With Impunity ] heretofore,the main principle Appellee in these crimes,district judge,Captherine D.Parry.Furthermore, Viacon Broadcasting of Missouri(VBM),the term includes all officials and employees of VBM maned in th- is case.VBM crosses state lines by its activities in these activities. not only covers the State of Missouri and Illinois but several of States around Missouri.See e.g., International | : Shoe Co.vs.State of Washington,Office of Unemployment Compen-— sation and Replacement, 326 US 310,66 S Ct 154,90 L Ed. 95(1945). Federal District Court,East St.Louis is the appropriate distr- iet from the Eastern District of Missouri at St.Louis,Missouri. (4) WHETHER, This Appeal should be reversed,because the deliberate failure of District judge,William D.Stiehl's to adhere to the prerequisite principles of Rule 58 Federal Civil Procedural,re- quiring all final judgment on a separate document ? Rule 58 Fed.R.Civ.P.,sets the procedural by which district court enter's its judgments on its docket .records.The date a judgment is “entered" on the docket,the time for making post- trial motions,for taking appeal,and inter alia,executing on relief awards,always on a separate document by. either the cou- rt of its clerk.The Judgment M-U-S-T be set forth separately from any judicial opinion or memorandum, and M-U-S-T be labe- led "Judgment -16~