◆ SpookStack

455 et seq.,and Rule 12(b)(1)(2)(3)(6),under Articles III § I and IV § 2(1),of the Constitution,Section 2 of the Thirte- enth Amendment,the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments,as interpreted and app- lied by federal Judges,Unconstitutional on its face,Racist, Discriminatory,designed for abuses by federal judges,in the role as Attorneys,Counsels,and Representatives for Defendants in the Complaints,White,Rich,Famous and Powerful,persons,Com- panies and Corporations,United States vs-.Will,supra. l-Appellee,William D.Stiehl,district judge,Eastern district of Illinois,denied Appellant's Motion pursuant to 28 USC § 455 et seq.,and issued a fraudulent order which states in part: "Before the Court is plaintiff's motion for disqua- Lification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455. Plaintiff seeks this judge's disqualification because the Court dismissed plaintiff's previously filed law- suits.He asserts these dismissals are evidence of conflict of interest and disregard for plaintiff's civil rights.However,"'judicial rulings alone ne- ver constitute valid basis for a partiality motion ,'" Liteky v.United States,114 S ct 1147, 1157(1994). Here,the only basis of bias or prejudice alleged is the Court's prior rulings.This is insufficient,stan- ding alone,to warrant recusalor disqualification un- der § 455. Accordingly,plaintiff's motion to disqua- lify is DENIED." See copy of said court's order attached as Appendix(C).The statement that Appellant's basis of his motion,based on rul- ings alone by the judge/Appellee herein,are just known false~ ly Manufactured L-I-E(S),It is the deliberate failure of jud~ ge Stiehl,to follow the Federal Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedurals,and conspired with Defendants in those Complaints whom most are Federal officers of the courts,including the US Supreme C _24- “Rae