◆ SpookStack

Court,e.g.,see attached hereto copy of the previous Rulings by Appellee,Stiehl,Three(3) separate and Different Civil Rig- hts Complaints,which Appellant Paid three(3) $120.00 filing fees,set out on one court order,in violation of both Rules 52 and 58 Fed.R.Civ.P.,Appellee/judge are stating this were appropriate,and within the Rules of procedural ? See Appendi- x(H).Only the cation of the order.See further copy of a Memo for Clerk,listed Joint Appendices-A,A2,A3,A4,B.C.D.E.F.G.H.J. K.,Exhibit(1}) and Appendices 6A,6B, and 6C, for the court's inspection, [ Overwhelming Indisputable Documentation Evidence establishing guilt on the part of each Defendant,including Ju- stices of U.S.Supreme Court,Appellees herein,Appellee Stiehl Did Conspired Agreed and did acted in furtherance of that Con- spiratorial Agreement,coverup and concealed those Class A Fel- ony Crimes by judicial order.See copy of that memo attached as Appendix(I).Appellant did im memo for Clerk,Requested tran~ smission of all those récords on appéal,and should be in this Court's records and files.The coverup by Appellee/Stiehl,goes far and beyond the scope of § 455 et seq.,the evidence against Appellee/Stiehl,overwhelmingly sufficient for Impeachment, re~ moval from office,prosecuted and imprisoned as other citizens guilty of identical Class A Felony Crimes.And Liteky vs.Unit- ed States,114 S Ct 1147 at 1157(1994), offers no support to the crimes knowingly committed by Appellee, Stiehl,conduct that stooped far below the accepted conduct of a judicial officer. 2.A party has seven defenses it may assert as grounds for dismissal.A case will be dismissed under Rule 12 if the court lacks the statutory authority to hear and decide the dispute -25-