◆ SpookStack

concerning clerk return of briefs (25 and the original),at that time of the returns, Appellant had no idea,what the term "Short appendix" represented,it were the duty of the court and its clerk,to precisely state what it required the Appel- lant to due.Only two days prior to Appellant's receipt of said court's order,herein,did he received copy of court's local rules from clerk's office. 3.The order further states in part: " ",..eewith the proper blue cover and the title of the appeal must match. the title on this order which is the title from the court's docket." This statement,indicates that,regardiess of the title of App- ellant's Brief on appeal,and the briefs were forwarded to the court's clerk,prior to any docketing.Appellant Must neverthe- less [ Read the clerk's mind, as to exactly how the clerk will docketed the brief,and fashion the briefs accordingly ] prior to submission to the clerk.In all other Federal Courts clerks must docket the pleadings as the plaintiff,petitioner, or appellant's has titled it,;naming the appellees that were defendants in the district court. 3(a)-The court's alleged order,further extorts the title, and the appeal,whereas it attempt to classify the appeal as only Jones.vs.United States Supreme Court, Appellant and App- ellee,which is not the case. 3(b),The so-call order further,deprives both Appellees and Appellant of procedural right to notify each appellee named in the brief,through its [ Certificate of Service ] that its a named appellee,and copy of the brief served upon him/her. -2-