◆ SpookStack

and that this deliberate distortion of the brief's contents grossly conflicts with other Federal Courts of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court,on the issue of title,see Cre g.,attached hereto copy of brief filed in another Federal ci- reuit Court,and one filed in U.S.Supreme Court,naming Appell- ees and Respondents,as Appendices(B) and (C).What we have he- re,a Clear example of what the Fifth Circuit spoke of,conce- rning. the relationship between the Judges,and clerks,in Hall vs.Small Business Administration, 695 F 2d 175 at 178,179, (Sth Cir.1983),here,the clerk of court,too L-A-Z-Y¥ to do its Statutory Duty,and list names of Appellees as on the brief, which are the same in the district court,went to the judge, and asked that it alter the brief and fashion it to the cler- k's liking.,which were granted by the alleged judge in the nonjustifible order.Appendix(A).Appellant P-A-I-D the same fees in this Court as other attorneys,White,Rich,Famous and powerful,and is entitled to identical Due Process and Equal protection under the law,Haines vs.Kerner, 404 US 519 at 520, 521(1972), reaffirmed in Estelle vs.Gamble, 429 US 97 at 106, 97 S Ct 285 at 292(1976).these rights were protected by the Supreme Court for prisoners,which has less due process and equal protection rights as other citizens of the United Stat~ es. 3(c)-The so-called court's order in its present form,are no more than the perpetration of a fraud against the Civil and Constitutional Rights,Privileges and Immunities of Appellant. Which would not have accrued in cases of Attorneys,White,Rich -3-