Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Senator Edward Kennedy — Part 27
Page 95
95 / 154
LR
° Yd
.
Py
‘ @ _—
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
SYLVESTER JONES, )
- Plaintiff,
v. CAUSE NO. 96-CV-776-WDS
» etal,
Defendants. oc L . D
T 011996
STUAR 1
STIEHL, District Judge: ome
Before the Court is plaintiff's motion for disqualification pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 455. Plaintiff seeks this judge’s disqualification because the Court dismissed
plaintiff's previously filed lawsuits. He asserts these dismissals are evidence of conflict
of interest and disregard for plaintiff's civil rights.
However, "judicial rulings alone almost never constitute valid basis for a
partiality motion." Litexy v. United States, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1157 (1994). Here, the only
basis of bias or prejudice alleged is the Court’s prior rulings. This is insufficient,
standing alone, to warrant recusal or disqualification under § 455.
Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to disqualify is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 2C7 Zeplenie dae
DIS UDGE ;
072A
Rev. 8/82)
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic