◆ SpookStack

1 -5- investigations." The Court had no right to do this, and the Courtis effort to do this should be curbed. The first subperagraph of m bill would accomplish this result by taking away from the Court appellate juris- diction of such matters. The subparagraph numbered ! of my bill would take from the Court its appellate jurisdiction over the Government's security program. When the Supreme Court has reached the point where it will hold, as it held in the Service case, that a regulation by the Department of State can destroy a statutory right to remove from Government service an employee deemed by the head of the agency to be a security risk; and when the Supreme Court has become so befuddled as to hold, as it held a year ago in the case of , that a spy in a Government department is not dangerous unless he is occupying a position which has been specifically classified as "sensitive"; when these things have some to pass, Mr. Chairman, it is time to curtail the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in this field. The subparagreph numbered ! of m bill is designed to protect the rights of the people to protect themselves, through their dulyeelected State gpvernments, from subversive activity at the State level. The Supreme Court