Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 11
Page 106
106 / 114
-
4 _
' ;
-_.
-'
has
been given,
by
the
Constitution,
power
to
curtail
or
limit
the
appellate
jurisdiction
of
the
Supreme
Court.
This
is
the
approach
which
is
embodied
The
right
of
appeal
to
the
Supreme
Court
is
not
a constitutional
right.
Ho
man
has
A constitutional
right
to
more
than
one
trial.
Due
process
does
not
require
th
_-gment
of
more
than
one
court.
any
appeal
procedure
is
a matter
of
grace,
not
of
right.
Congress
has
conveyed
upon
the
Supreme
Court
the
appellate
power
which
it
has,
and
Congress
can
cm"tail
or
limit
that
power.
My
bill
proposes
to
limit
the
appellate
power
of the
Supreme
Court
in
five
respects.
These
limitations
are
set
forth
in
the
bill
in
five
subparagraphs,
beginning
on
page
2.
Let
me
discuss
each
of
them
briefly,
and
refer
briefly
to
the
area
in
which
each
is
expected
to
operate,
with
particular
reference
to
the
recent
Supreme
Court
decisions
which
in
my
judgment
make
these
limitations
necessary.
The subparagraphnumbered !
involves the investigative
power
of
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic