◆ SpookStack

- ~ = dle security subcommittee hearing on certain date and president attended -hearing but failed to produce records, stating to subcommittee that he waa usu irected to subcommittee conducting hearings stated that president was produce records according to terms of subpoena, president was properly directed to produce records in accordance with subpoena, and his failure to do 50 was willful and he was guilty of contempt. Judgment affirmed. . The 0. S. Supreme Court, per curiam vacated judgment of Court of Appeals, and remanded case for consideration in light of Watkins v. oo U. 5. Barenblatt v. U, S, (1957) 354 U.S. 930 SB rr Prosecution for contempt of Congress for defendant's refusal to - answer certain questions during his testimony before subcommittee of ~ Committee of Un-American Activities of House of Representatives. The District Court entered judgment of conviction, and defendant appealed. The Court of Appeals held, inter alia, that indictment charging defendant with unlawfully refusing to answer enumerated questions concerning his past membership in activities in the Communist Party was not fatally defective even though it did not plead a deliberate and intentional or ksowing refusal to answer, and affirmed judgment. The U. S. Supreme Court, per curiam, vacated judgment of Court of Appeals, and remanded case for consideration in light of Watkins v. U, S.