Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Surreptitious Entries Black Bag Jobs — Part 21
Page 68
68 / 194
Memo to Mr. Callahan
Re: Surreptitious Entries
All There was one memorandum in this file that upon first glance would
indicate that surreptitious entries had been made through 1973; however, it
"New York investigation over the past three n ng clandestine
methods of communications utilize isclosed
Va) sey oo so advised." The first two informants were symbol a
TH © PM oumbers nbers designated for surreptitious entries at the residences o
resolved through interview; however, as indicated previously, this was not
possible since the Department conv eyed the specific request that no inter-
| gg eis felt that it was merely a choice of words, Specifically, py airtel of 1/24/74
from New York to the Director, New York was taking the position ‘hal
rould not be productive. As part of their justification —
or taking this position their communication stated in part the following:
that she has received 'drop mail’ on a few occasion -called ‘drop’
ould be identified, if at all, on the letter itse
the last was the symbol number designated for a posjdence in which she
We previously resided. se
Admittedly, there are many unanswered questigng that could only be
views be conducted by the FBI in connection with the Inspection Division review
of the forego:ng material.
On late Monday afternoon, 5/3/76, just prior to Inspection Division's
departure to New York, Departmental Attorney Gardner, who personall
handled review in New York, advised Supervisory Special Agent
Intelligence Division, that as a result of hia review he felt strongly
that a criminal investigation should be conducted and he would so recom-
mend this action to his superior, Assistant Attorney General Pottinger.
He indicated at this point that there were four possible options, they being:
he investigation but
@ indicated he feit
2. That the Inspection Division of the
that it be headed by a representative of a pbobably
this was the best courge ofa pop and Brobably thé
we ete @ he iy)
‘Bureau. }
3. Recommend that nothing ihe ¥
employees involved were acting within | therg: s ODI -
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic