Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
DOW-UAP-D48, Department of the Air Force Report, 1996
Page 138
138 / 181
318. 148F (Busy Stepson), 17 Jan 67, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 2.5: Flight was
norm.al except that reentry vehicle failed to separate.
344. 81F (ABRES/AFSC), 27 Oct 67, Response Mode 4T, Flight Phase 1: Although
various anomalous events occurred early in flight, the missile appeared to follow
the intended trajectory till about 24 seconds. Diverging roll oscillations actually
began about 21.4 seconds, and pitch and roll stability were lost by 24.8 seconds.
By 27.9 seconds, the vehicle was tumbling about 6.5 degrees per second in pitch
and yaw, and 12 degrees per second in roll. By 30 seconds, the vehicle lost all
thrust and began to break up. Fuel cutoff and destruct were sent at 35 and 39
seconds, respectively.
•
358. 95F (ABRES/AFSC), 3 May 68, Response Mode 5, Flight Phase 1: Immediately
after liftoff the telemetered roll and yaw rates indicated that the missile was
erratic. During the first 10 seconds of flight the missile yawed hard to the left. It
then began a hard yaw to the right, crossed over the flight line and continued
toward the right destruct line. Shortly thereafter the missile apparently pitched
up violently and the IIP began moving back toward the beach. The missile was
destructed at about 45 seconds when the altitude was about 14,000 feet and the
downrange distance about 9 miles. Major pieces impacted less than a mile
offshore, indicating uprange movement of the impact point during the last part of
thrusting flight.
364. 5104C AC-17 (ATS-D), 10 Aug 68, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 4: A normal
parking orbit was achieved, but when Centaur restart was attempted, thrust could
not be maintained because of inoperative boost pumps. Frozen H20 2 line was the
apparent root cause.
365. 7004 SLV-3/Burner II/Agena D (AFSC), 16 Aug 68: Response Mode 4, Flight
Phase 3: Atlas performance was norm.al. The vehicle failed to achieve orbit
because th~ protective shroud surrounding the second stage failed to separate.
368. 56F (ABRES/AFSC), 16 Nov 68, Response Mode 4T, Flight Phase 2.5: Flight was
norm.al through SECO. The missile then lost attitude control, executing a hard
yaw rate tum throughout and beyond the vernier solo phase.
372. 5403C AC-20 (Mariner 6 Mars), 24 Feb 69, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 1:
Early Atlas BECO due to staging accelerometer failure was compensated for by
extended Atlas sustainer and Centaur burns. Mission was successful.
379. 98F (ABRES/AFSC), 10 Oct 69, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: The missile
appeared normal until about 66 seconds when the sustainer engine shut down
prematurely. The booster engine apparently continued normally to BECO. At
about 255 seconds the payload SPDS engine ignited. Destruct was sent at 272
seconds.
9/10/96
129
RT!
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
ufo
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic