Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Amerithrax — Part 11
Page 10
10 / 33
FD-302aRev.10-6-95
b6
279A-WF-222936-USAMRIID, 279A-BA-C101392
b7C
06/06/2003
2
Continuation of FD-302 of
On
Page
of excess formaldehyde.
recalled a study conducted by
LNU and
(phonetic) using tissue embedded with west
Nile virus and/paraffin.
The aim of the project was to determine
the effectiveness of DNA extraction following formalin fixation of
the tissue. This method of decontamination did not hinder
subsequent DNA amplification; however, proteins within the tissue
were affected. A methodology was developed which facilitated the
release of formaldehyde from tissue using organic reagents.
Oxidation and halogenation of bacterial spores result
from exposure to chlorine dioxide gas. Chlorine binds to cellular
components yielding inactivation of proteins and enzymes required
for cellular arowth.
has researched extensively the use
of chlorine dioxide as a decontaminant.
The intensity of gamma irradiation used for
decontamination is typically not enough to nick strands of DNA.
However, exposure to gamma rays may damage the DNA and decrease the
sensitivity of PcR techniques. Significant amounts of radiation
would be necessary to completely abolish a PcR signal. Generally,
the degree of DNA chopping depends on the extent and intensity of.
exposure. DNA has also been shown to survive the autoclaving method
of decontamination.
Latent fingerprints are lipid imprints which may be
destroyed by alcohols, detergents and physical wiping. Gamma
irradiation was not known to affect the detection of latent.
fingerprints.
and
were not aware of studies
to determine the effects of formaldehyde vapor, chlorine dioxide,.
and hydrogen peroxide on the detection of latent fingerprints..
Bacterial spores are more resistant than vegetative cells
to decontamination efforts. Generally, the effectiveness of
disinfection depends on the concentration of the decontaminant and
the length of exposure. Often, post-decontamination analyses yield
negative culture results and positive PcR hits. These results
indicate the absence of detectable levels of viable microorganisms,
but the presence of characteristic DNA. When testing for the
presence of microorganisms, it is important to test first for
viability via culturing, followed by confirmation analyses using.
PCR.
indicated that sA
was familiar with
post-decontamination tests of biosafety cabinets treated with.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic