Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
CIA RDP81R00560R000100010003 8
Page 5
5 / 29
Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP81R00560R000100010003-8
FLYING SAUCERS continued
the doctor saw the couple together and soon real-
ized that both needed help. They had brought
with them a copy of the NICAP report written by
Walter Webb.
Dr. Simon's attitude toward the subjett of
Pos was neutral. He was willing'to accept what-
ever authoritative sources said about it
Atthecloseofthesession, Dr. Simondecided
that one of his objectives was to open up the am-
nesia, if this was what the condition turned out to
be. This symptom. usually responds particularly
well to hypnosis.
He planned to begin the therapy with an at-
‘temptto penetrate theamnesia, through hypnosis,
and to proceed from there as indicated by devel
‘opments. Dr. Simon also decided to tape-record
the therapeutic sessions, to preserve an accurate
record and to have the tape available for probable
later use in bringing the material into the con-
sciousnessoftheHillsundercontrolledconditions.
Barney’ sand Betty'sknowledgeofhypnosis
was fragmentary. Dr. Simon explained that the
Hills would be brought into a condition some-
what akin-to sleep, although not identical to it.
In a lecture some years before to The New
‘York Academy of Medicine, Dr. Simon discussed
hypnosis and its function in medical and psychi-
atric practice:
“Who can hypnotize? Who can be hypno-
tized?” Dr. Simon asked in the lecture. “Any in-
telligent adult with appropriate knowledge of
technique can hypnotize....Psychotic individuals
and the mentally retarded are very ‘resistant. to
hypnosis. Most of these cannot be hypnotized...
“Will plays no part whatever in: hypnosis,
and the beliePthat*hypnotizability-is-a manifes-
tation of a weak will is false... .
“Hypnosis has gone through many periods
of enthusiastic acceptance and then ensuing re-
jection, as-have some of our ‘modern trends’ in
psychiatry. There is no doubt that these-symp-
toms (those removed by hypnosis) tend to recur
or to be replaced by more distressing symptoms,
unless the underlying emotional conflict (of
which the symptoms are manifestations) is re-
solved. Unless the physician can be sure that he
will be able to continue treatment of the patient
after the removal of the symptoms, the symptoms
should not be removed by hypnosis. .
“Many question whether a forcible break-
through of resistance (such as that which is pro-
vided by hypnosis) is a desirable approach. In a
variety of conditions, hysterical, psychosomatic
and others, hypnosis may help to shorten the time
of therapy by facilitating the approach to uncon-
scious conflicts. ... Hypnosis has dangers, and yet
it isnot dangerous. The essential dangers lie in
its use by those not bound by a professional code
of ethics and who are not adequately trained.”
As the Hills were to discover, they were in
cautious, medically conservativehands. They were
to run into a stiff test of whatever beliefs they now
had as a result of their experience at Indian Head.
Aceight in the morning, on Saturday, Jan-
uary 4, 1964, the Hills arrived at the doctor's
office for the first of three sessions in which the
doctor would repeatedly induce hypnosis. as a
conditioning process.
They responded well. The doctor was satis-
fied that they could attain the depth of trance de-
sired. In exploring the amnesia, both the doctor
and the patients would be going up a blind alley,
and the reinforcement of the hypnosis. would
make it possible to maintain firm control in the
face of possible emotional. disturbances.
Barney's nervousness increased somewhat
as he prepared to undergo hypnosis for the first
time. Dr. Simon placed him by the large desk
in the office, his hands at his sides, and stood
near him, in front of the desk and just in front
of a comfortable chair. 2
“Dr. Simon began talking to me,” Barney
recalls, “telling me that I was relaxing, and: he
had me clasp my hands together, and that they
would be tight, tight, very tight, that I couldn't
open them no matter how hard I tried. And I was
standing there, feeling very, very foolish, because
Ithoughtf this is hypnosis, there is nothing to it.
I’m just humoring the man. I didn’t want co hure
his feelings. I think he stopped and placed. his
hands over my eyes so that they would close. I
said to myself that I wasn’t really hypnotized,
and when he told me that I couldn't pull my
hands apart, I knew that all I had to do was open
my fingers and I could do it. But I just didn’t feel
like opening my fingers. I didn’t even feel I was
asleep, but then I was aware that he was waking
me up, and asked me how I felt. And I felt very,
very good, very calm and comfortable. And I no
longer had any fear of hypnosis.”
The opening up of amnesia requires’ the
use of time regression, wherein the patient's mem-s
ory becomes vivid and exact, where details long
forgotten to the conscious mind emerge sharply.
Itis notunusual for a person in hypnosis to recall
the names and color of the eyes of everyone at his
fifth birthday party if so requested. There is also
the tendency to relive, fe-create, reenact the time
segment being recalled, so that the subject ac-
tually experiences emotions involved in the origi-
nal experience, a process referred to as abreaction.
The physician must always recognize the danger
in bringing to light unconscious memories and
feelings. These may be intolerable to the patient
and can lead to serious after-reactions,
“After the first test,"” Barney Hill recalls, “a
curious thing happened. As I got ready for the~
induction into hypnosis, I looked at my'watch. It
must have been five minutes after eight. And he
gave me the key word, and I was hypnotized.
And as far as time was concerned, I thought he
was waking me immediately. But I looked at my
watch, and it was after nine. Yet it seemed no time
at all. I recalled also, just at the beginning of
what must have been the trance, that he had
ked my hand with something thac fele like the
Piste of a brush, I asked himst I could see this
done! So the doctor put me in a trance again, and
told me to open my eyes, and that I would re-
member this part of it. Then he took a needlelike
instrument and pushed it against my hand, and
there was no pain, except pethaps like a bristle
of a brush. He put considerable pressure on it,
and I could feel.no pain. The needle had pene-
trated my skin, and there wasn’t any blood. So I
began to realize that there were two things that
could happen here: One, I could be hypnotized
and made to forget that I had been hypnotized at
all; two, I could be hypnotized, and if I'was told
I could remember, I would retain a knowledge of
all that had taken place under hypnosis.”
Dr. Simon decided to take Barney first, hop-
ing to regress him to the night of September 19,
1961, and have him reveal every detail of the
trip from Canada to Portsmouth. Since the trance
would provide details of marked clarity, and since
there was a reasonable expectation that Barney:
would bridge the amnesic gap'under hypnosis,
the blocking off of his memory after each session
would permit Betty to give her own story in later
sessions without being influenced by Barney.
On February 22, 1964, Barney was ready to
make his excursion into the unknown.
CHAPTER
“Lam scared. God, |'m scared!”
BARNEY TOOK His SEAT in front of the doctor's
desk. He started to reach for a cigarette, but upon
hearing the key words from Dr. Simon, his eyes
closed, and his head nodded. His hands were
folded across his lap, and he gave the appearance
of having dozed in an easy chair. The deep trance
was induced. The doctor began the session:
DocToR: You are deeper and deeper asleep. Deep
asleep. You will remember everything now, and
you will tell me everything. And I want you to
tell me in full detail a/! your experiences; all of
your thoughts and all of your feelings, beginning
with the time you left your hotel... .
After retracing in precise detail the
visit 10 Montreal, the trip into Canada
and the upper part of Vermont and the
drive down U.S. 3, Barney then men-
tioned the object in the sky.
BARNEY: I look up through the windshield of
the car, and I see a star. That’s funny, but [ said:
Betty, that's a satellite. And then I pulled over
to the side of the soad, and Betty jumped out her
side with the binoculars. .. . And I look towards
the sky... And I'm saying, hurry up, Betty, so I
can get a look. And Betty passes the binoculars
to me. And I see that it’s nota satellite. It is a
plane. And I tell Becty this and give the binocu-
lars back to her. And I'am satisfied.
Doctor: What kind of a plane was it?
BARNEY: I look—and it is to the right. And it
does not go where I thought it would go. It does
not go past me to the right, my right shoulder. I
think it will pass my right shoulder, off in the dis-
tance, going to the north. I am facing west, and~”
my right is to the north. And it does not go to
the north.
A faint trace of amazement. comes
into bis voice. From his tone, it is ap-
parent that he is reliving, not retelling,
“the story.
DOCTOR: Does it have propellers?
BARNEY: I cannor tell. And I think this is stranger
I cannot hear a motor, to know if it has propellers:
continued
Approved For Release 2001/04/02 : CIA-RDP81R00560R000100010003-8 took 104-46 53
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
staff declassified
flying objects ufo
ufo
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic