Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Adrian Lamo — Part 3
Page 231
231 / 501
Slashdot | Adrian Lamo Charegyith Hacking @ Page 10 of 33
The above is, unforunately, the analog to what's happening in
the electronic world.
I'm not saying that Lamos and other selfappointed white hat
hackers are RIGHT in what they do (I believe they aren't), but
even if the messenger isn't welcome, you don't shoot him or
blame hime for all the problems he reports.
The main reason why you shouldn't do that isn't just because
it’s a petty thing to do, but because you HURT yourself and
others in the long run.
See, if I were a hacker operating like Lamos, and saw
companies doing that, instead of alerting the companies and
risking facing their and the paranoid law makers full wrath, I
would stop alerting the companies about their flaws --
instead, I would anonymously alert the PUBLIC.
Seen from the viewpoint of a company, what's better about
that? Yet, that's what they're pushing hackers into.
The companies might argue that they would want people to
stop rattling doors in the first place, and that’s a valid
argument. However, it's not going to happen until you have
exterminated every potential criminal and curious kid on the
planet.
In a Utopia, you don't even need a door lock, because no-one
would ever walk through the door without a right to do so.
However, companies can't argue that as a defense -~ not
installing a lock would be seen as gross negligence, because
it's expected that criminals and curious people will trespass
unless minima: safety measures are taken. That's how our
society is.
Charging Lamos is a signal, all right. Unfortunately the signal
isn’t "don't test our security uninvited", but "once you've
tested our security uninvited, don't tell us -- stay anonymous
and tell it to everyone else".
Regards,
*Art
{ Reply to This | Parent ]
« Re:Great Excuse by Penguin's Advocate (Score:2) Saturday
September 06, @04:30PM
» Re:Great Excuse by Shdwdrgn (Score:1) Sunday September
07, @01:50PM.
«= Re:Great Excuse by iserlohn (Score:1) Saturday September 06,
@01:172M
= Re: the car anacogy by King TI (Score:2) Saturday September 06,
@01:38PM |
FBI(19-cv-1495)-1902 |
http://slashdot.org/articles/03/09/06/1325221 shtml?tid=123 &tid=126&tid=1 72&tid=99 9/8/2003
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic