Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Adrian Lamo — Part 3
Page 233
233 / 501
Slashdot | Adrian Lamo Chars Hacking r Page 12 of 33
Re:Great Excuse (Score:5, Interesting)
by hattig (47930) on Saturday September 06, @10:53AM (#6887147)
(Last Joumal: Tuesday August 26, @08:53AM)
Agreed. If he wanted to perform white hat hacking, he should have approached.
the companies involved and asked for a job to test their security. Hell, he'd have
earned money that way as well.
But he did commit a crime - he broke into and entered their systems without
permission. Sure, he did it for a good reason in his own head, and wasn't going
to be malicious ... but it isn't as if he was doing the internet equivalent of
rescuing the baby in a house fire.
[ Reply to This | Pavent ]
Re:Great Excuse (Score:5, Insightful)
(#6887191)
How different is this from the investigative reporters on your local news
broadcast. In many cases a white hat my find that customer's CC numbers
or SS numbers are accessable via an exploit or weak security. In a way,
he/she would be helping the public by giving the company and
opportunity to correct the situation or at least take it public. An
investigating reporter may find that a company or governemnt office is
throwing out sensitive info without shredding it or taking the proper
preventative measures. If] am giving a company like Amazon my CC#, I
want to oknow that they are going to protect that info. Who is going to
watch/audit the company if they get lazy?
{ Reply to This | Pazent ]
Re:Great Excuse by jjhlk (Score:1) Samrday September 06, @02:39PM
Re:Great Excuse by mindstrm (Score:1) Saturday September 06, @02:42PM
Re:Great Excuse by mindstrm (Score: 1) Saturday September 06, @02:44PM
Re:Great Excuse by bitflip (Score:1) Saturday September 06, @03:00PM
Re:Great Excuse by mariox19 (Score:1) Saturday September 06, @04:23PM
© Lreply beneath your current threshold.
Re:Great Excuse by themassiah (Score:1) Saturday September 06, @10:56AM
o Re:Great Excuse by moonbender (Score:3) Saturday September 06, @11:32AM
© 2replies beneath your current threshold.
« Re:Gre: cuse by LostCluster (Score:2) Saturday September 06, @10:57AM
o Re:Great Excuse by SSI Vegeto2001 (Score:1) Saturday September 06,
@11:18AM
= Re:Great Excuse by Shanep (Score:2) Saturday September 06, @12:34PM
© lL reply beneath your current threshold.
Re:Great Excnse by Spicerun (Score:1} Saturday September 06, @10:58AM
e Re:Gre: cuse by AArmadillo (Score:1) Saturday September 06, @11:01AM
© J reply beneath your current threshold.
Re:Great Excuse (Score:5, Interesting)
by moonbender (547943) <moonbender AT t-online DOT de> on Saturday
September 06, @11:02AM (#6887197
(http://moonbender.host.sk/)
So if someone had broken into my house without permission, then
FBI(19-cv-1495)-1904
hitp://slashdot.org/articles/03/09/06/1325221 shtml?tid=123&tid=1 26 &tid=172 &tid=99 9/8/2003
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic