Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Adrian Lamo — Part 3
Page 394
394 / 501
| _ ous AM 5/30/2001, Internet Policy News Page 5 of 9 Pees
A representative from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), one of several
U.S. government organizations belabored with the task of cracking down on
spammers, said Thursday that it has limited resources in aiding consumers in
the fight against bulk e-mail.
"We're not an agency that can set the laws," said Jennifer Mandigo, staff
attorney with the FTC's consumer division. "But the FTC is ready to
generally enforce whatever (Congress) passes."
Ted Gavin, a consultant with Nachman Hays Consulting who is helping to draft
policy against spam for the marketing industry, said that the issue will be
better fought by reaching the people using direct e-mail marketing as an
advertising venue. Many companies selling products or services would have
better luck targeting a specific audience rather than blanketing mailing
lists with spam, Gavin said. Many marketing professionals fall victim to the
fallacy that distributing mass e-mail is low cost.
"The 'Net is not a free resource," Gavin said. "Somebody pays for everything
that gets done on the Internet. There is always a cost associated with
sending an e-mail.”
The cost is hard to calculate, Gavin said, but includes the resources ISPs
use to deal with large amounts of data being sent over their networks, The
cost is also borne by consumers who have to pay for the time it takes to
download spam through their ISP. In fact, the European Commission said in a
report earlier this year that spam costs European Internet users about 10
billion euros ($8.57 billion) every year in money spent on Internet
connectivity.
Since the early 1990s, when America Online first took its service to
consumers, the Internet has become a gold mine for direct marketers,
according to Geller. (AOL Time Warner is the parent company of CNN.com.)
Since then, marketing scams such as Ponzi and pyramid schemes have migrated
from mail and newspaper advertisements to the less costly medium. And there
may be no way to get rid of spam if governments, marketers and consumers
don't come to @ consensus on a solution.
"T remember e-mail before there was ever marketing, when it was just a bunch
of techies chatting online,” Geller said.
b6 -5
b7C -5
FBI(19-cv-1495)-2156
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic