Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Cambridge Five Spy Ring — Part 11
Page 47
47 / 85
Even when suspicion finally fell upon them,
hey were allowed to leave the country as
asily as if they were going for a day tip
to Boulogne without passports.
The depth and extent of the treachery have
been exposed only because one Russian spy
chose to sell out. What else is there that
is vile and rotten and has not been
exposed? sot '
NEXT CHAPTER
Are we to wait for the next spy who comes
over before we hear the next instalment
of this sordid and disquieting story?
If the guilty officials ‘can help it, we will
hear nothing more except what may be
forced out by the next accidental
disclosure.
There is only one man who can make sure
that the White Paper or the subsequent
debate in the Commons will have any real
meaning or any real value.
Secretary. Nobody can possibly blame hi
‘or the ill-smelling mess he has inherit:
But he alone can clear it up.
Tip-off
3 That a friend who,
knew of the investi:
gation Warned Maclear®
‘The Secret Service
does not know how the’
secret got out and pre-
sumably have been un-
able to find any hole
there may be in the
That man is Harold Macmillan, the =i
By CUY EDEN
wre gave Maclean
the tip-off that
he was under sus-
: pieion, enabling him
' to escape before the
‘Intelligence men
* closed about him?
That is one of the security net.
main. questions which _ Sir Perey Sillitoe, head
have been worrying the- -of, M.U5, the British:
Counter Espionage
Organisation at the time
of the Maclean-Burgess
escape. had no comment
to make last night.
Lord Strang, who
was Permanent, Under-
Secretary of State at
security chiefs “ever
since Maclean and Bur-
gess disappeared more
than four years ago.
Foreign Office
spokesman admitted
yesterday that it seemed
certain some such hint
his free a
ciocuments, was able.to (TOL. MARCUS
pul two and txo lo LIPTON, Socialist
gether from what he M.P. for Brixton, put
Would see, and come to gown a question yester~
thé conclusion that he asking Sir Anthon;
haf better get out. eA J v
den:
g|that an investigator “Whether. he, wi
acted clumsily in his appoint a Select Com
jntuiries and gave the mittee to investigate ih
alarm. circumstances of , #
mystery
va" MP CALLS FOR NEW PROBE
tows
le alone can insist on having the names and
the heads of the men who have persistently
fed the Ministers, Parliament and the
people with calculated fies.
UNSUSPECTED
We are far from suggesting that the Foreign
Office is a nest of traitors. But the Foreign
Office is a place almost equally dangerous.
It is a place where traitors have been able
to nest, unsuspected and “uncontrolled.
We do not pretend to know the reason for the
immunity that the traitors so long enjoyed.
lt may have been negligence, favouritism,
laziness or plain stupidity, Whatever the
reason, the! public must have ~ firm
assurance that the scerdal will never
happen again.
Then another White Paper will be called
for. Not a White Paper BY the Foreign
Office, but a White Paper ON the Foreign
Office. The difference between the two fs
the difference betwen a whitewashing add
a thorough clean-upe
the Foreign Office at cowntry, without at least
the same time. retired in being ordered to remain.
November, 1953, her
Lord Strang is & Rus-
sian expert. fn 1930 h
WHY was not some
e@ “holding charge” made
against them?
was appointed Acti
Counseilor, at Mos WHY, if they were
and acted as chargé ynder ‘suspicion, were
affaires.
MPs want to know:
WHY, if their activi-
ties were unger investi-
gation by | Intelligence
and security authorities,
were Burgess and Mac-
lean allowed to continue
their work in the
Foreign Office?
WHY were they
allowed to get out of the
they not suspended?
WHY did the Govern-
ment put up a security
screen of silence avout
the two men after they
had escaped behind the
Iron Curtain?
DID Intelligence lose
track af them until
Petroy made iis revela-
tions in Australia?
spokesman said yester-
day that definite sus~
picions fell on Maclean
by April, 1951.
Burgess wis not Har
ticulurly under invdpti-
gation as to his secufity
and his loyalty, but this
general condi was
under examination.
disappearance of Bur-
gess and Macican and
the general efficiency of
Civi] Service. security
arrangements.”
But it seems unlikely
this wili be granted be-
cause doth Front
jenches ure involved.
‘A Foreign Office
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic