Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Alfred Kinsey — Part 2
Page 8
8 / 38
jm—to-take advantage of their intellectual
and emotional immaturity. Frequently
the laws do achieve this purpose. But at
other times they result in some strange
situations. For example, if a 21-year-old.
man has an affair with a 30-year-old’
divoreée who works as a waitress in a!
tavern, society remains indifferent; if he.
does so with a high-school girl of 16 or'
_ 17, heis considered a corrupter of youth
and in most states a statutory rapist.
But the 30-year-old waitress may have
the mentality of a 12-year-old and no
more sense of social responsibility than |
a 10-year-old, while the 17-year-old girl
may be a mature, all-A student.
I. is difficult to draw an arbitrary line
to establish sexual maturity at any
point; but if a line must be drawn, we
believe that there are many reasons for
thinking it should be set at 16. The av-
erage 16-year-old girl is biologically an
adult; she is sexually mature, has de- §
veloped all the physical strength and ©
coordination required for living in our ¥
society, and has at least a basic know!- A
edge of the kind of behavior that society
expects. Until this century, in which
childhood has been prolonged by the
vast expansion of high-school and col-
lege education, 16-year-olds were ac-
cepted as members of adult society,
and many girls married at 16. (One of
the prisoners who aroused the most
sympathy among the institute staff
was a Mexican boy who had been
convicted of statutory rape with a
16-year-old girl; he pointed out almost.
tearfully that his own mother was 16
when he was born.)
Our feeling at the institute is that so- |
ciety makes a serious mistake in adopt '
ing laws and attitudes that set teen-!
agers apart from the adult world; when
we treat teen-agers like children, we en-
courage them to behave like children,
while in fact they are capable of acting
dults—if we could only Tet them. .
” Mv personal opinion is that the sex
laws should be rewritten so that any act
between two mature people—as long as
it is engaged in voluntarily and in
private—would be legal. (This is also
the recommendation of the Anglican
Church, the American Law Institute
and Britain’s Wolfenden Committee,
and is the gist of the new sexual statutes
quietly adopted by the state of Illinois
in 1961.) Such a law would be far more
suited to our modern world—and would
result in far fewer injustices—than the
old-fashioned statutes now on the books.
One of the great problems now is that
society’s altitude toward sex and its sex
laws are in open conflict. We live in a
highly charged sexual atmosphere; the
ever-present message of our literature,
our movies and our advertisements is
“Be sexual; find romance; get a mate.”
But our laws say that all sexual be
havior outside marriage is a crime.
If early marriage were possible and
desirable for everyone, perhaps the con-
flict would be less acute. But the de-
mands of our complex civilization delay
the age of marriage, especially for the
most intelligent and most sensitive of
our young people, the ones who go to
college. And we have never squarely
faced the fact that some people do not
really wish to get married; others, be-
cause of personality quirks, really should
never marry—they are foredoomed to
be bad husbands or wives, and would be
even worse parents, Society makes ni
provision for the people unsuited for mar; .
riage, nor does it exempt them from oh
sexual propaganda that surrounds us.
They are constantly urged from all sides
toleada rich, full sex life—yet prohibited
by law from doing so.
‘Under laws such as I have suggested,
and the state of Illinois has adopted,
many of the men we interviewed would
never have been in prison at all—includ-
ing the substantial number who had
been convicted on charges of statutory
rape or “contributing to delinquency”
involving girls over 16; of adultery with
older women and of homosexual offenses
involving no use of force.
We realize that many Americans may
be shocked by this recommendation, yet
all these acts, in the opinion of the in-
stitute staff, are crimes in name only.
We feel that it is one thing to deplore
the sexual behavior of adults on moral
grounds or even grounds of good taste—
but quite another to send them to prison
and keep them there at an expense that
is equal, in most cases, to the cost of
idjng a young man with the same
number of years of a college education.
2 re eae cee
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
federal bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic