Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
9 11 Commission Report — Part 4
Page 17
17 / 57
The PBI has modeled its intelhgence program on the tradinonal intelligence cycle
used by all intelgence enhties, including those identified m the question.
‘Through the intelligence cycle: 1) inieligence information prorities are identified
by national-level officials, 2) collection strategies are developed by analysts and
sonmmuniwated to collectars, who then collect the information by developing
apprdpriate sources, 3) the analysis and evaluation of collected inteiigence is
converted into Intelligence products, 4) intelligence products are disserninated to
consumers ingade and outside the FBI, and 5} a feedback mechanism is created to
provide collectors, analysts, and collection strategy developers with consumers’
evaluations of intelligence value. To ensure uniform implementation of thesé
processes, the Ol led an FBI-wide effort sn 2003 to develop and promulgate a
CONOPS foreach process. In addition, the FBUhas developed implementation
plans for each CONOPS and implementation is tracked through a master
scheduls.
While the intelligence cycle outlined above is common to all intelligence entities,
the mechanisms by which it isamplemenied are tailored to the overall missions of
the orgamizations in which they are housed. The FBI has implemented the
intelligence cycle according to four core principles: 1) the independence of the
intelligence requirements and collection management process from operations,
2) the mtegration of intelligence production and operations, 3) the standardization
of mtelligence processes and policy by the OF and the execution of those processes
and policies by all operational divisions, both at headquarters and m the held, and
4) the matny management of all analysts, with performance rating accomplished
by operational entities and performance review accomplished by intelligence
entities to ensure that analyst standards are maintained
7, Are you modeling your reform hased on any other democratic country’s internal
intelligence service? Have you looked at the structure and operation of other suck
systems? If se, what have you concluded?
The FRI has studied extensively the mechanismis and structures according te
which other democracies perform domestic mteligence production, and has
benefitted greatly fom a number of independent analyses of these structures and
processes, most notably from the recent stady by the RAND Corporation. We
have reached three fundarnental conciusions from our review: 1) each domestic
mtelligense service is charged with performing the same basic functions, 2) each
nation has built organizations io perform those functions that best leverage ther
larger federal and municipal structures, and 3) no organizational construct is
sufficrent in and of itself to ehminate “searne" in mformatan shang.
16
MISC. REO. #53 000004683
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic