Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
9 11 Commission Report — Part 34
Page 19
19 / 23
To: Counterterrorism From: Berlin
Re: 315N-WF-227135, 12/05/2003
Attorney Schulz then asked Fromm who had checked the
accuracy of the U.S. Congressional Report on September 11th. Fromm
could not answer that question, and suggested that Schulz direct his
question to the United States Government.
Defense attorney Pinar asked Fromm what he would say if
someone stated that the planning had not occurred in Afghanistan, but
instead in Hamburg. Fromm testified that this would contradict the
analysis and conclusions of the BfV.
She now asked whether this was derived from "open" sources
of information. Fromm testified that it was derived from all
available "open" sources of information which had been evaluated.
She then asked how probable was it that the idea for using
aircraft as bombs for September ilth had been conceived in Hamburg
before the trip to Afghanistan.
Attorney Schulz objected to the form of ‘the question as
being based upon probability factors.
The Chief Judge overruled the objection and allowed the
question to stand.
Attorney Schulz asked the entire court panel to issue a
formal ruling.
The court now granted a short recess, while it deliberated.
about the objection.
When the court returned to the courtroom, the Chief Judge
ruled that the question, of the likelihood of the Hamburg Group
having conceived of utilizing aircraft as bombs before the
Afghanistan trip, would be permitted to stand.
Fromm now testified that he was only familiar with the
BfV's own analysis and conclusions. He could not exclude the
possibility that the idea had been conceived in Hamburg, but he could
not say so with any specific degree of probability.
Defense attorney Pinar asked whether there was any other
analysis which had come to a different conclusion than the one
presented by Fromm. Fromm testified that the BfV was unaware of any
activities that were undertaken in Germany to prepare for the
September llth attacks. The first indications of preparations for
the September llth attacks came at the end of 1999 when the Hamburg
Group members began to interest themselves in flight training.
11
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
investigation
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic