Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Billy Carter — Part 12
Page 29
29 / 50
Memorandum E. J. O'Malley to Mr. F. M, Mullen FUCTIPCRV ab
Re: BILLY CARTER -
Judge’ Renfrew on the evening of 7/28/80, that he had suggested
that Judge Renfrew obtain Director Webster's concurrence on
the release of the material but that he did not know whether such
a release had in fact been obtained but that he took the responsi-
bility for the release of the information. DAD Nolan advised
Mr. Heymann that absent any approval by Director Webster it
was not acceptable to the FBI for the DOJ to release FBI
information in this case or in any other case. Mr. Heymann
stated that he believed that in a closed case the DOJ could
release such information. He was informed that this was not
the case and both Messrs. Keeney and White concurred that
it was not the case. Mr. Heymann apparently believes that the
exigencies of this case justified his action.
Mr. Heymann further stated that he did not wish to leave
it up to the Senate to orchestrate the release of information
with regard to the Billy Carter case but rather believed that
based on the press statement by the President that he wished
all information to be brought forward in this case as quickly
as possible and that the DOJ should also release publicly the
Billy Carter file at the same time we were providing it to the
Senate Subcommittee since there are a number of pending FOIA
requests in the DOJ with regard to the Billy Carter case. It
was Mr. Heymann's opinion that the DOJ could justify this public
release of a case file as being pursuant to the FOIA requests.
Mr. Parker argued for establishing with the Committee orderly
procedures for handling the information provided to them prior
to making public release. He also questioned the wisdom of
establishing a precedent in this case of the opening of DOJ files
simply because there was a strong public interest and a pending
Congressional inquiry. FBI representatives supported Mr. Parker's
position. It was agreed, however, that the FBI would process
the Carter file for FOIA release at the same time we were processing
it pursuant to the Senate request and that the FOIA processing sho
be coordinated between the FBI's FOIA experts and Fred Hess of the DOJ
so that uniform standards would be applied and a single DOJ release
would be made which would include FBI information. Mr. He
advised that he would recommend to Judge Renfrew that he discuss
with the Director the advantages of making public as much information
on this case as would be possible and at the earliest date possible.
He also agreed that no additional FBI information would be released
without FBI review. Mr. Parker advis ed that he was meeting with
representatives of the Subcommittee on the morning of 7/31/80 and
that no DOJ response should be sent to the Committee's letters
until after he could advise us of the results of the meeting.
erm qetes ter et center
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic