Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Bugsy Siegel — Part 18
Page 39
39 / 100
SAC August 20, 1946
Hotel would come up to the hearing with high-price lawyers and technical
experts. I asked him if the builders of the Flamingo Hotel were not already
on notice that his organization was conducting an investigation, and he ad-
mitted that they had already appeared at the first hearing with high-price
lawyers and technical assistants.
GR... proposed that we hold off our investigation util after
the CPA hearing Septenber 5. He said that if both the CPA and the FBI investi- 7%
gate this matter we might both fail, but that if CPA alone investigates it the b
chance of CPA failing is less. However, he stated that if the CPA faila to
make its case then they will turn the matter over to us. I told him that he
himseit stated that we would be going over the same investigation, and I pointed
out that if that ts true that if the CPA fails then the FBI fails, He adnitted
that this was true.
Thea emia thing 2 . .03. reveal as te the foture investicetion
——S Tae, ketene =) =. eww Wihh OW Sh FU
of the CPA was that they plantea to take photographs of the work as it now
atands on the Flamingo Hotel and to try to get technical assistance, He said pie
that they might not be able to get this technical assistance and then he did
not know what the results of their case might be. He said that they thought
they might try to get additional plans used by the construction company.
I then aac 2 he thought that the CPA could make a case
that would "stick." He replied that he did think so, otherwise, they would br
net proceed with further investigation. Weaturally he qualified tad a bn atating
that it depends on what evidence is secured, that if the same evidence is secured
that he feels can be secured the stop order of the CPA can be made final.
We asked QE: + recourse the builders have in the <>.
event the stop order is made final) amd they stated that they can appeal to e-
the Chief Compliance Officer of the CPA after which they can have recourse
to the Federal courte for « restraining order.
Wen asked if there was anything else that I wanted, and I
told him that we had not received anything that we came for, that what we bx
wanted was the full facts on this entire matter. I told him that apparently
he had no intention of furnishing that to ua and his attitude was that he
would have to secure the authority for him to furniah thia information to us
from his superiors in Washington. He stated that thie was correct.
62-28 poe
eee ee ee : a neg - : ce ee ee em me ee
matt
ep oe ot hp AO A A
ernie os
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic