Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Bugsy Siegel — Part 18
Page 38
38 / 100
—T
SAC August 20, 1946
matter but were representatives of another Government_agency which had jurisdiction wad
to investigate fraud against the Government. I asec: © the builders of pa
the Flamingo Hotel would be entitled to a copy of the transcript of this hearing, tt
and answered the question by stating, "Yes, they would if they pay the
Leos
said that he did not want to appear unreasonable but suggested
that we wait until the completion of the hearing on September dbl:
time he would be willing to turn over all of the informations en
pointed out that it was August 20 and the hearing was to de he ep er 5
and that we would te held up only two weeks. We pointed out that time is of
the essence in a matter of this kind, that the individuals involved in this
matter __ fast, end that a greal deal of evidence could disappear in two
weeks en stated that we had gone over the case yesterday, and I prow
advised him that if he had furnished us the facts in this matter yesterday I
epperently had missed hearing them and asked that he repeat the facts in contro-=
versy on the whole investigation, He then stated_that the matter revolved sroumd
whether the first permission which was granted was valid and whether
the builders of the Flamingo Hotel were constructing one building or more than
one buildinge I pointed out that we were dealing in generalities and that we
wanted the facts in the matter. I pointed out that they had presented a case
before a commissioner and had received an adverse rulings I asked him why an
adverse ruling had been received, and he stated that "You would have to read
the commissioner's mind to get the answer to that." I told him that I dia
not believe that was the case, that in any court proceeding by analysing the
facts presented by the Government and those presented by the defense you can
obtain the reasons for a decision.
then reverted back to the theory that the matter was highly
technical. I then asked him why the stop order was sent to the builders of
the Flemingo Hotel, and he said that was based on investigation conducted by
the Compliance Division of the CPA which had been furnished to the Washington
headquarters of the CPA, who had issued the atop order. I asked him in view
of the fact that this investigation had been conducted if they were not in a
position at that time to present a case before the commissioner which would
uphold the contention of the Government, and he stated that they were supposed b 7c
to be in a position to do that tut sometimes they were caught short on a stop
order and they do not have enough evidence to present. He said that he felt
that if the FBI conducted an investigation of this matter at this time it would
harm the investigation of the CPA. I asked him how it would harm the CPA in-
vestigation, and he said he did not mow. I then advised him tha d not
believe that our investigation would interfere with the CPA cose.
remarked about ewarma of agents out investigating this matter who h
duplicating the CPA investigation and said that the builders of the Flamingo
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic