◆ SpookStack

L & 100-1812, . SS a reported that with regard to ELSLER's Commnist Farty ties, been informed that the Subject had attended a meeting at ge? the United States CP headquarters in New York in 1946. BISLER's function at the meeting was to instill new life j roup attending the meeting and add fervor to their Party spirit. aid that EISLER was men- _” 4 tioned in a conversation overheard by a former Soviet government employee, eo who had been in Mexico City in 1945. This conversation overheard by the ; former Soviet employee was that his superior had just had a very interesting TS he conversation with HANNS EISLER. By letter dated February 2, 1948, the Bureau advised that a former Soviet employee who had been attached to the Rabassy of the U.S.5.R. in Mexico City, one KIRILL M. ALEXEIEV, had furnished the information that he was present at the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City when a conversation took place between gySoviet military attache and another member of the Enbassy PAROV. KASPAROV remarked that he had received a commni- staff, GREGOR cation from LER which had to be answered immediately further stated o%o that EISLER was "our best friend and one of our own." uw} i ov’ gs j On February 3, 19,2, furnished to SA a r 28, 1947, r letter from BOHUS BENES to HANNS EISLER which was dated No q an and written on the letterhead of the Czechoslovak Consulate, 690 Market -” \* ,”Btreet, San Francisco 4, California. This letter was sent via registered Ny +, alr mail to Mr. HANNS EISLER, 23868 W. Pacific Coast Highway, Malibu, ' rar California. In this letter BENES stated that he had received the letter KOA from EISLER, together with the documents and application forms concerning’ \ V\, 2+ @ passport and the check for six dollars. BENES stated that when he had ¢ talked by telephone with Mrs. EISLER, he had informed her about the possi- L ¢ bility of issuing a Czechoslovak passport to both the Subject and his wife for a period of six months. BENES based his authority to do this on a report from the Ministry of Interior in Prague, which stated that they had no objec- tion to issuing a passport to EISLER and his wife if the Subject “OER oy a -~3- Veil