Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
National Security Letters — Part 1
Page 837
837 / 1188
So we're not -- trust me. I'm not happy that we have this report and thal I'm in a
position of saying, you know, we failed.
ELLISON:
Excuse me, Ms. Caproni, if] could just go back to Mr. Fine.
Mr. Fine, one of the changes that was made in the Patriot Act was to say, I think,
people other than headquarters officials could issue these fetfers.
Should the authority for issuance of the letters be retracted to what it was before the
Patriot Act?
FINE:
I’m not sure of that, and I don't want to necessarily give legislation that should occur.
I do think it's important, if that authority is out there, that it has to be overseen.
And bringing things back to headquarters may or may not be the answer. As you recall
in the September 11th attacks with the Moussaoui case, one of the concerns was
headquarters was controlling the field too much.
And so, there are considerations on both sides of this issue. I do think that when it does
go out there, it has to be used appropriately and overseen appropriately.
ELLISON:
But if you had a narrower route through which these letters were authorized, wouldn't
you have greater accountability?
FINE:
You could. You could have greater accountability. On the other hand, the effectiveness
could be diminished significantly.
So | think that's the balance that has to be struck, Congressman.
CONYERS:
Time of the gentleman has expired.
But I would like to say to Mr. Ellison, he's raised the point that we need to try to figure
out at this hearing: Are there in existence the resources that are required and needed to
reveal all of these people who have been abused or violated by this system?
CONYERS:
For this hearing to close down with the gentleman from California, Mr. Berman, who
will be recognized next, without us having figured out, for example, that we don't have
anywhere near the resources, as I've been talking with the gentleman from Catifornia, Mr.
Lungren, about, either in the Federal Bureau of Investigation or in the Office of the
Inspector General.
If resources don't exist here, we may end up very well correcting everything from this
point on, but how many thousands of people will have been violated that will -- we'll all
be saying from now on, “Not to worry. It's all over with.”
And that is a troubling consideration, Mr. Lungren, that we've had under discussion,
that I'm still looking for the answer to.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic